Delineating the risk factors of venous congestion: An analysis of 455 deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps with radiographic correlation
Research article published in Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS (2022)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Venous congestion occurs in 2-15% of DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. We previously showed that thicker suprascarpal fat pads are associated with increased SIEV caliber and may, by extension, indicate a dominant superficial venous system. In this study, we aim to provide clinical correlation and to determine the risk factors of venous congestion in order to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from prophylactic SIEV dissection. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective study was performed in patients who underwent DIEP flap reconstruction from August 2011 to August 2020. Radiographic measurements of suprascarpal fat pad thickness and SIEV diameter were collected per hemi-abdomen from preoperative imaging. The statistical analysis explored whether certain variables were associated with venous congestion. RESULTS: A total of 258 patients underwent 455 DIEP flaps. Suprascarpal fat pad thickness was positively correlated with SIEV diameter (r = 0.51, p<0.001), each with a mean caliber of 19.8 mm and 2.5 mm, respectively. Seven flaps (1.5%) developed venous congestion, with five requiring SIEV salvage and secondary venous anastomosis. Congested flaps had significantly thinner suprascarpal fat pads (12.3 vs. 20.0 mm, p = 0.043). All six congested flaps with imaging had suprascarpal thickness less than 18 mm, compared to 182 out of 335 non-congested flaps with imaging (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of venous congestion following DIEP flap reconstruction is significantly increased with thinner suprascarpal fat pads, suggesting that the mechanism of venous congestion may not be limited to superficial venous dominance. We recommend prophylactic SIEV dissection in all patients with suprascarpal fat pad thickness less than 18 mm.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Peer-reviewed clinical and outcomes research relevant to medicinal leech therapy and its biology. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio retrospectivo (Huang et al., 2022) de 258 pacientes sometidos a 455 colgajos DIEP para reconstrucción mamaria examinó los factores de riesgo de congestión venosa, hallándola en 7 colgajos (1.5%) y reportando que los colgajos congestionados presentaban almohadillas grasas suprascarpales significativamente más delgadas (12.3 vs 20.0 mm), con todos los colgajos congestionados evaluados mediante imagen por debajo de los 18 mm de grosor; los autores recomiendan la disección profiláctica de SIEV en pacientes por debajo de ese umbral. Esto es importante para la hirudoterapia porque la congestión venosa es la complicación precisa para la cual las sanguijuelas medicinales se utilizan con mayor frecuencia como salvamento del colgajo, por lo que cuantificar qué colgajos están predispuestos ayuda a dirigir tanto la profilaxis quirúrgica como cualquier terapia adyuvante con sanguijuelas. Advertencia: se trata de un análisis retrospectivo de un solo centro con muy pocos eventos de congestión (7 colgajos), estudia predictores anatómicos y quirúrgicos en lugar de la aplicación de sanguijuelas en sí, y no hace ninguna afirmación sobre los resultados de la terapia con sanguijuelas.
Citación
Delineating the risk factors of venous congestion: An analysis of 455 deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps with radiographic correlation.
Huang et al. · Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 2022
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026