Experience with pharmacologic leeching with bivalirudin for adjunct treatment of venous congestion of head and neck reconstructive flaps
Retrospective study published in Microsurgery (2018)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to review the feasibility of local bivalirudin injection for adjunct treatment of venous congestion of head and neck reconstructive flaps. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent bivalirudin treatment for venous congestion of head and neck reconstructive flaps in a single institution from September 1, 2012 to September 1, 2015 was undertaken. Individuals were treated with variable number of intradermal injections directly into the flap followed by a small skin incision to allow extended passive bleeding. The main outcome measure was improvement of flap congestion. RESULTS: Ten patients with free flap reconstruction (4 anterolateral thigh flaps, 2 pectoralis major flaps, 2 fibula osseocutaneous flaps, 1 supraclavicular flap, and 1 radial forearm free flap) of various head and neck defects underwent treatment with bivalirudin. Bivalirudin injections were utilized as adjunct therapy in 6 patients. Two individuals underwent alternate therapy for venous congestion immediately following injection and therefore the efficacy could not be assessed. Of the 8 remaining flaps, 4 developed partial necrosis, and 1 developed complete necrosis requiring additional reconstruction. Two individuals required blood transfusions during bivalirudin treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Bivalirudin is a safe and feasible adjunct therapy for treatment of flap congestion. It may serve as a useful alternative to traditional leech therapy, as bivalirudin negates the need for antibiotic prophylaxis, eliminates the psychological aversion associated with leech therapy, and avoids the potential for leech migration. Further work to determine the efficacy of bivalirudin to standard leech therapy is warranted.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Single-institution retrospective study of 10 patients with bivalirudin local-injection for venous congestion of head-and-neck free flaps. 8/10 flaps assessable; 4 partial-necrosis, 1 complete-necrosis. Bivalirudin negates need for antibiotic prophylaxis.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta revisión retrospectiva de historias clínicas evaluó la inyección local de bivalirudina como tratamiento adyuvante para la congestión venosa de colgajos reconstructivos de cabeza y cuello en 10 pacientes. De los 8 colgajos evaluables, 4 desarrollaron necrosis parcial y 1 necrosis completa, y 2 pacientes requirieron transfusiones. Los autores concluyeron que la bivalirudina es segura y factible y puede constituir una alternativa útil a la hirudoterapia tradicional al evitar la profilaxis antibiótica, la aversión psicológica y la migración de la sanguijuela. Esto resulta relevante para el ámbito de ASH, ya que posiciona un anticoagulante relacionado con la hirudina respecto a la hirudoterapia medicinal en el manejo de la congestión de colgajos. La advertencia honesta es que se trata de una serie pequeña no controlada, que la eficacia no pudo evaluarse en 2 pacientes, que no se realizó ninguna comparación directa con la hirudoterapia con sanguijuelas vivas, y que los autores exigen explícitamente más estudios para determinar la eficacia comparativa.
Citación
Experience with pharmacologic leeching with bivalirudin for adjunct treatment of venous congestion of head and neck reconstructive flaps.
Harun A et al. · Microsurgery, 2018
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026