Epistaxis Versus Nonepistaxis Bleeding in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial
Research article published in Journal of the American Heart Association (2025)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epistaxis is common with antithrombotic therapy and is often troublesome to patients, yet its frequency, severity, and outcomes are poorly characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS: Effective Anticoagulation with Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48 (ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48) randomized 21 105 patients with atrial fibrillation and CHADS2 risk score ≥2 to higher-dose edoxaban regimen (60 mg daily, dose-reduced to 30 mg), lower-dose edoxaban regimen (30 mg, dose reduced to 15 mg, daily), or warfarin. Bleeds were adjudicated using International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria. Patients with intracranial hemorrhage during follow-up were excluded; those with >1 bleeding event were categorized according to their most severe event. The safety cohort with interval censoring during drug interruption was analyzed. Proportions were compared using Pearson's chi-square test and treatment arms were compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. Among 5247 patients with a bleeding event, 1008 (19.2%) had epistaxis and 4239 (80.8%) had nonepistaxis bleeding. Epistaxis events were less severe than nonepistaxis bleeds (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major: 3.2% versus 20.7%; clinically relevant nonmajor: 64.7% versus 60.1%; minor: 32.1% versus 19.2%; P<0.001). Permanent drug discontinuation was similar following epistaxis versus nonepistaxis bleeding in patients with major (59.4% versus 53.6%; P=0.52) or clinically relevant nonmajor (32.5% versus 33.3%; P=0.70) bleeding but was significantly higher in patients with minor epistaxis versus other minor bleeds (33.3% versus 23.9%; P=0.001). Compared with warfarin, higher-dose edoxaban regimen had similar risk of epistaxis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09 [95% CI, 0.95-1.26]), whereas lower-dose edoxaban regimen conferred reduced risk (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.62-0.86]). CONCLUSIONS: Epistaxis was frequent, and despite being overall less severe than nonepistaxis bleeding, was associated with similar rates of anticoagulant discontinuation. Compared with warfarin, lower-dose edoxaban regimen reduced the risk of epistaxis by 27% whereas higher-dose edoxaban regimen had no effect. REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00781391.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Peer-reviewed research on safety and infection-control considerations relevant to leech therapy and anticoagulation. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este análisis secundario del ensayo aleatorizado ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 caracterizó el sangrado en 21,105 pacientes anticoagulados con fibrilación auricular, encontrando que entre 5,247 con un evento de sangrado, la epistaxis (19.2%) fue generalmente menos grave que el sangrado no epistáxico, pero impulsó tasas similares de discontinuación permanente del anticoagulante, y que el régimen de edoxaban a dosis más baja redujo el riesgo de epistaxis frente a warfarin (HR 0.73) mientras que la dosis más alta no lo hizo. Para la hirudoterapia, esto es contextual más que directo: la terapia con sanguijuelas produce un efecto anticoagulante localizado mediado por hirudin, y este ensayo es un recordatorio útil de que incluso un sangrado comparativamente menor (exudado similar a la epistaxis) influye materialmente en las decisiones clínicas y la tolerabilidad al tratamiento — relevante al evaluar la terapia con sanguijuelas en pacientes que ya están con anticoagulantes sistémicos. La advertencia honesta es que este es un análisis post-hoc de un ensayo farmacológico de anticoagulación en fibrilación auricular sin ningún componente de sanguijuelas, por lo que cualquier relación con el sangrado relacionado con sanguijuelas es solo por analogía.
Citación
Epistaxis Versus Nonepistaxis Bleeding in Anticoagulated Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Results From the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial.
Semco et al. · Journal of the American Heart Association, 2025
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026