Risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism.
Review published in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH (2023)
Abstract
Approximately 5% of pulmonary embolism (PE) cases present with persistent hypotension, obstructive shock, or cardiac arrest. Given the high short-term mortality, management of high-risk PE cases focuses on immediate reperfusion therapies. Risk stratification of normotensive PE is important to identify patients with an elevated risk of hemodynamic collapse or an elevated risk of major bleeding. Risk stratification for short-term hemodynamic collapse includes assessment of physiological parameters, right heart dysfunction, and identification of comorbidities. Validated tools such as European Society of Cardiology guidelines and Bova score can identify normotensive patients with PE and an elevated risk of subsequent hemodynamic collapse. At present, we lack high-quality evidence to recommend one treatment over another (systemic thrombolysis, catheter-directed therapy, or anticoagulation with close monitoring) for patients at elevated risk of hemodynamic collapse. Newer, less well-validated scores such as BACS and PE-CH may help identify patients at a high risk of major bleeding following systemic thrombolysis. The PE-SARD score may identify those at risk of major anticoagulant-associated bleeding. Patients at low risk of short-term adverse outcomes can be considered for outpatient management. The simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score or Hestia criteria are safe decision aids when combined with physician global assessment of the need for hospitalization following the diagnosis of PE.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Approximately 5% of pulmonary embolism (PE) cases present with persistent hypotension, obstructive shock, or cardiac arrest. Given the high short-term mortality, management of high-risk PE cases focuses on immediate reperfusion therapies. Risk stratification of normotensive PE is important to identify patients with an elevated risk of hemodynamic collapse or an elevated risk of major bleeding.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta revisión describe la estratificación de riesgo del embolismo pulmonar agudo, detallando herramientas validadas (guías ESC, puntaje Bova) para identificar a pacientes normotensos en riesgo de colapso hemodinámico y puntajes más recientes (BACS, PE-CH, PE-SARD) para el riesgo de sangrado, al tiempo que señala la falta de evidencia de alta calidad que favorezca una estrategia de reperfusión o anticoagulación sobre otra. Su valor para ASH radica en servir como antecedente sobre el equilibrio entre trombosis y sangrado que define toda la toma de decisiones sobre anticoagulación, la tensión clínica que motiva el interés en las diversas moléculas antitrombóticas del secretoma de la sanguijuela. Como revisión narrativa que resume las herramientas existentes en lugar de generar nuevos datos, y centrada en el manejo sistémico de la PE, no ofrece evidencia a favor ni en contra de la hirudoterapia, y varios de los puntajes citados se describen a su vez como aún no bien validados.
Citación
Risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism.
de Wit et al. · Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2023
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026