The importance of the Heart Team evaluation before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Results from the BRAVO-3 trial
Research article published in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2020)
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Clinicians use validated scores to risk-stratify patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, evaluation by the Heart Team often deems patients to be at higher risk than their formal scores suggest. We sought to assess clinical outcomes of TAVR patients defined as high-risk by the Heart Team's assessment versus the patient's logistic EuroSCORE (LES). METHODS: The BRAVO-3 trial randomized patients at high risk (LES ≥ 18, or deemed inoperable by the Heart Team) to TAVR with periprocedural anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin. Endpoints included net adverse cardiac events (NACE: the composite of all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, or bleeding), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death, MI, or stroke), the individual components of MACE, major vascular complications, BARC ≥ 3b bleeding and VARC life-threatening bleeding at 30 days. We compared patients deemed high-risk based on LES ≥ 18 versus high-risk by the Heart Team despite lower LES. RESULTS: A total of 467/800 (58.4%) patients were deemed high-risk by the Heart Team despite LES < 18. After multivariable analysis, there were no differences in the odds of endpoints between groups (NACE, ORLES≥18 : 1.32, 95% CI 0.86-2.02, p = .21; MACE, ORLES≥18 : 1.27, 95% CI 0.72-2.25, p = .41; major vascular complications, ORLES≥18 : 0.97, 95% CI 0.65-1.44, p = .88; BARC ≥3b, ORLES≥18 : 1.38, 95% CI 0.82-2.33, p = .23; and VARC life-threatening bleeding, ORLES≥18 : 0.99, 95% CI 0.69-1.41, p = .95). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing TAVR and labeled high-risk by LES ≥ 18 or Heart Team assessment despite LES < 18 have comparable short-term outcomes. Assignment of high-risk status to over 50% of patients is attributable to Heart Team's clinical assessment.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Clinicians use validated scores to risk-stratify patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Utilizando datos del ensayo aleatorizado BRAVO-3, este estudio comparó los desenlaces clínicos a corto plazo de pacientes sometidos a reemplazo valvular aórtico transcatéter (TAVR) que fueron considerados de alto riesgo mediante una evaluación del Heart Team frente a un EuroSCORE logístico formal (LES). Mientras que el ensayo original aleatorizó a los pacientes a anticoagulación del procedimiento con bivalirudina o heparina no fraccionada, este artículo se enfoca enteramente en la toma de decisiones clínicas y las métricas de estratificación de riesgo. El resumen no describe el origen farmacológico de la bivalirudina ni ninguna conexión con compuestos derivados de la sanguijuela. El estudio no proporciona ninguna evaluación directa de sanguijuelas, el secretoma de la sanguijuela ni las prácticas de hirudoterapia.
Citación
The importance of the Heart Team evaluation before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Results from the BRAVO-3 trial
Camaj A et al. · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2020
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026