Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

The importance of the Heart Team evaluation before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Results from the BRAVO-3 trial

Research article published in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2020)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Observational studyEnsayos clínicosDesarrollo de fármacosSeguridad y control de infeccionesFarmacología salivalCamaj A et al. · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2020

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Clinicians use validated scores to risk-stratify patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, evaluation by the Heart Team often deems patients to be at higher risk than their formal scores suggest. We sought to assess clinical outcomes of TAVR patients defined as high-risk by the Heart Team's assessment versus the patient's logistic EuroSCORE (LES). METHODS: The BRAVO-3 trial randomized patients at high risk (LES ≥ 18, or deemed inoperable by the Heart Team) to TAVR with periprocedural anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin versus bivalirudin. Endpoints included net adverse cardiac events (NACE: the composite of all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, or bleeding), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death, MI, or stroke), the individual components of MACE, major vascular complications, BARC ≥ 3b bleeding and VARC life-threatening bleeding at 30 days. We compared patients deemed high-risk based on LES ≥ 18 versus high-risk by the Heart Team despite lower LES. RESULTS: A total of 467/800 (58.4%) patients were deemed high-risk by the Heart Team despite LES < 18. After multivariable analysis, there were no differences in the odds of endpoints between groups (NACE, ORLES≥18 : 1.32, 95% CI 0.86-2.02, p = .21; MACE, ORLES≥18 : 1.27, 95% CI 0.72-2.25, p = .41; major vascular complications, ORLES≥18 : 0.97, 95% CI 0.65-1.44, p = .88; BARC ≥3b, ORLES≥18 : 1.38, 95% CI 0.82-2.33, p = .23; and VARC life-threatening bleeding, ORLES≥18 : 0.99, 95% CI 0.69-1.41, p = .95). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing TAVR and labeled high-risk by LES ≥ 18 or Heart Team assessment despite LES < 18 have comparable short-term outcomes. Assignment of high-risk status to over 50% of patients is attributable to Heart Team's clinical assessment.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeComparative StudyJournal ArticleMulticenter Study
Indexed MeSH termsAgedAged, 80 and overAnticoagulantsAntithrombinsAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisClinical Decision-MakingDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHemodynamicsHeparinHirudins

Resumen

Clinicians use validated scores to risk-stratify patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Using data from the BRAVO-3 randomized trial, this study compared short-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) who were deemed high-risk by a Heart Team assessment versus a formal logistic EuroSCORE (LES). While the original trial randomized patients to procedural anticoagulation with either bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin, this article focuses entirely on clinical decision-making and risk stratification metrics. The abstract does not describe bivalirudin's pharmacological origin or any connection to leech-derived compounds. The study provides no direct evaluation of leeches, the leech secretome, or hirudotherapy practices.

Citación

The importance of the Heart Team evaluation before transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Results from the BRAVO-3 trial

Camaj A et al. · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2020

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.