Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Aspirin is Not for Everyone: Discharge to Non-home Facilities After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

Research article published in Arthroplasty today (2024)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportEnsayos clínicosSeguridad y control de infeccionesMcHugh M et al. · Arthroplasty today, 2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients discharged to non-home facilities (NHD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty experience higher rates of adverse events and may require more aggressive venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis. Our aim was to compare the rates of VTE in NHD patients and those discharged home (HD) after THA/TKA. Our secondary aim was to determine VTE rates within HD and NHD groups when stratified by chemoprophylactic regimen. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of primary THA and TKA patients were stratified into HD and NHD, then allocated into groups by chemoprophylactic regimen on discharge: aspirin alone (AA), more aggressive (MA) chemoprophylaxis, and other regimens (other). The primary outcome was VTE. Rates of VTE in HD and NHD patients, as well as AA and MA regimens, were analyzed using a generalized linear regression model. RESULTS: Six thousand three hundred seventy-nine patients were included with 1.03% experiencing VTE. HD had lower rates of VTE compared to NHD (0.83% vs 2.17%, P < .001). AA had similar rates of VTE compared to MA (0.99% vs 1.08%, P = .82). NHD patients had a lower VTE rate with MA vs AA prophylaxis (1.47% vs 3.83%, P = .016). HD patients treated with AA vs MA had no difference in VTE rates (0.76% vs 0.96%, P = .761). CONCLUSIONS: NHD patients have higher rates of VTE than HD patients. However, NHD patients have significantly lower rates of VTE on MA chemoprophylaxis compared to those on AA. Providers should consider prescribing MA VTE chemoprophylaxis for NHD patients. Prospective, randomized studies are necessary to confirm these recommendations.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Resumen

Patients discharged to non-home facilities (NHD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty experience higher rates of adverse events and may require more aggressive venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

Esta cohorte retrospectiva de 6,379 pacientes sometidos a artroplastia primaria de cadera y rodilla comparó las tasas de tromboembolismo venoso (VTE) según el destino al alta y el régimen de quimioprofilaxis, encontrando que los pacientes enviados a centros no domiciliarios tuvieron tasas de VTE más altas que aquellos dados de alta a casa (2.17% vs 0.83%) y, dentro de ese grupo de mayor riesgo, menos eventos con una profilaxis más agresiva que con aspirina sola (1.47% vs 3.83%). Para la ASH, el estudio proporciona un contexto útil para el trasfondo del manejo antitrombótico frente al cual se utiliza la terapia con sanguijuelas en entornos posquirúrgicos y de rescate de colgajos, ilustrando que la intensidad de la tromboprofilaxis está estratificada por riesgo en lugar de ser un enfoque único para todos. Al tratarse de una cohorte observacional de una sola base de datos, no puede establecer causa y efecto, y los propios autores solicitan ensayos prospectivos aleatorizados antes de cambiar la práctica; tampoco aborda la hirudoterapia directamente.

Citación

Aspirin is Not for Everyone: Discharge to Non-home Facilities After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism.

McHugh M et al. · Arthroplasty today, 2024

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.