Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.
Review published in Gland surgery (2015)
Abstract
Breast reconstruction can be performed using a variety of techniques, most commonly categorized into an alloplastic approach or an autologous tissue method. Both strategies have certain risk factors that influence reconstructive outcomes and complication rates. In alloplastic breast reconstruction, surgical outcomes and complication rates are negatively impacted by radiation, smoking, increased body mass index (BMI), hypertension, and prior breast conserving therapy. Surgical factors such as the type of implant material, undergoing immediate breast reconstruction, and the use of fat grafting can improve patient satisfaction and aesthetic outcomes. In autologous breast reconstruction, radiation, increased BMI, certain previous abdominal surgery, smoking, and delayed reconstruction are associated with higher complication rates. Though a pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is the most common type of flap used for autologous breast reconstruction, pedicled TRAMs are more likely to be associated with fat necrosis than a free TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Fat grafting can also be used to improve aesthetic outcomes in autologous reconstruction. This article focuses on factors, both patient and surgical, that are predictors of complications and outcomes in breast reconstruction.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Breast reconstruction can be performed using a variety of techniques, most commonly categorized into an alloplastic approach or an autologous tissue method. Both strategies have certain risk factors that influence reconstructive outcomes and complication rates.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Esta revisión examina predictores de complicaciones y desenlaces en reconstrucción mamaria, abarcando tanto los abordajes aloplásticos como los autólogos, y discute los factores del paciente y quirúrgicos que influyen en los resultados reconstructivos. Para la reconstrucción autóloga, los factores de riesgo como la radiación, el aumento del IMC, cirugía abdominal previa, tabaquismo y reconstrucción diferida se asocian con mayores tasas de complicaciones; los colgajos libres TRAM y DIEP muestran menos necrosis grasa que los colgajos pediculados TRAM. El artículo no menciona en ningún momento sanguijuelas ni hirudoterapia. La relevancia para el ámbito de la ASH es solo indirecta, dado que la transferencia autóloga de tejido libre es un contexto reconstructivo donde las complicaciones del colgajo pueden tratarse clínicamente; no se puede establecer ningún vínculo específico con las sanguijuelas a partir de este resumen.
Citación
Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.
Voineskos et al. · Gland surgery, 2015
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026