Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Variation in surgeon proficiency scores and association with digit replantation outcomes

Retrospective case series published in JAMA Netw Open (2021)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de la evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidencia: Informe de investigaciónLiteratura clínicaYoon AP et al. · JAMA network open, 2021

Resumen

IMPORTANCE: Risk-adjusted variation in surgeon outcomes has been traditionally explained by surgeon volume and hospital infrastructure, yet it is unclear how a surgeon's operative proficiency directly contributes to their patients' outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To assess the variation of surgeons' operative proficiency and investigate its association with surgical outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This case series was a retrospective analysis of all digit replantations and revascularizations at a single US university medical center between January 2000 and August 2020. Surgeons were assigned a proficiency score based on the expected procedure difficulty and outcomes from a sample of their cases. Surgeon proficiency scores were then used to determine associations with outcomes from subsequent cases. The expected difficulty of each case was calculated using a novel scoring system that applied pooled relative risks from a meta-analysis of risk factors for replantation and revascularization failure. EXPOSURES: Digit replantation and revascularization. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Digit survival at 1-month follow up (case success) and number of complications. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients and 226 digits were treated by 11 surgeons with training in hand or microsurgery (mean [SD] age, 41.9 [15.2] years; 204 [90%] men); there were 116 replantations and 110 revascularizations. Surgeon proficiency scores ranged from 1.3 to 5.7, with a mean (SD) of 3.4 (1.4). Case success rates among surgeons varied from 20.0% to 90.5%, with a mean (SD) of 64.9%. Higher proficiency scores were associated with fewer case failures: each point increase was associated with 40% decreased odds of failure (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.38-0.94). Every 3-point increase in proficiency score was associated with 1 less complication (effect estimate, -0.29; 95% CI, -0.56 to 0.02). Surgeon proficiency score had a greater association with case failure than surgeon volume (16.7% vs 12.0%). The final model's association with case failure had an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.93. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Operative proficiency varied widely among practicing surgeons and accounted for 17% of estimative ability for success of digit replantation and revascularization. Greater surgeon proficiency was associated with better outcomes, indicating that the value of surgical care may be optimized by improving surgeon proficiency.

Resumen tomado de PubMed (NCBI) para el registro citado, en el idioma original. La versión de referencia es la de la publicación original.

El resumen se deja sin traducir para conservar la redacción original de los autores.

Tipo de publicaciónJournal Article
Términos MeSH indexadosAdultAmputation, SurgicalClinical CompetenceFemaleFingersHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPropensity ScoreReplantationRetrospective StudiesSurgeonsTreatment Outcome

Síntesis

In 226 digit replantations and revascularizations by 11 surgeons, proficiency scores ranged from 1.3 to 5.7 and success rates from 20.0% to 90.5%; each point was associated with 40% lower odds of failure (OR 0.60).

Contexto

Esta serie de casos retrospectiva analizó a 145 pacientes (226 dedos) tratados por 11 cirujanos en un único centro médico estadounidense, encontrando que las puntuaciones más altas de competencia del cirujano se asociaron con una reducción del 40 % en la probabilidad de fracaso del caso en reimplante y revascularización digital. La competencia del cirujano mostró una mayor asociación con el fracaso del caso que el volumen quirúrgico del cirujano. El estudio no menciona la terapia con sanguijuelas, la hirudoterapia ni el manejo de la congestión venosa. El artículo se centra por completo en la evaluación de la habilidad quirúrgica y la predicción de desenlaces en el reimplante digital.

Citación

Referencia (estilo Vancouver)

Yoon AP, Kane RL, Wang L, Wang L, Chung KC. Variation in surgeon proficiency scores and association with digit replantation outcomes. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(10):e2128765. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28765. PMID: 34698849

Los datos bibliográficos (autores, volumen, páginas, DOI) proceden del registro de PubMed.

Contexto clínico relacionado

Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica

Investigación relacionada

Más estudios revisados por pares en la categoría «Literatura clínica».

Ver toda la investigación analizada por la ASH →

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: 27 de mayo de 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.