Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Three end-to-end techniques for microvascular anastomosis of vessels with different size discrepancy

Retrospective study published in Ann Plast Surg (2020)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportEnsayos clínicosZhang Y et al. · Annals of plastic surgery, 2020

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Size discrepancy in microvascular anastomosis is a common issue in free flap transfer and replantation surgery. A number of different techniques have been described to overcome the problem, but optimal method continues to be defined. METHODS: Since June 2015 to May 2018, clinical courses of 103 microvascular cases performed by one senior surgeon were reviewed. Three end-to-end techniques including mechanical dilation, single-mattress suture, and wedge resection were applied in 364 anastomoses with caliber ratio between 1:1 and 1:1.5, 1:1.5 and 1:2, and 1:2 and 1: 3, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 112 flaps were incorporated in this study. The incidence of anastomotic failure was 3.0% (11/364), and the overall flap failure rate was 3.6% (4/112). The failure cases included 2 replanted scalps, 1 replanted ear, and 1 superficial temporal artery flap for nasal reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Our results depicted operational convenience and reliability of the 3 end-to-end anastomotic techniques in addressing mild-to-large vessel discrepancy.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAnastomosis, SurgicalFree Tissue FlapsHumansMicrosurgeryReproducibility of ResultsSutures

Resumen

Series of 364 anastomoses using mechanical dilation, single-mattress suture, or wedge resection for varying caliber ratios. 3.0% anastomotic failure, 3.6% flap failure rates across 112 flaps.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This study reviewed 103 microvascular cases (112 flaps, 364 anastomoses) performed by one senior surgeon, comparing three end-to-end anastomotic techniques (mechanical dilation, single-mattress suture, wedge resection) for vessel size discrepancy in free flap transfer and replantation. Overall anastomotic failure was 3.0% and flap failure 3.6%. The relevance to ASH's domain is indirect: the work addresses technical aspects of microvascular surgery in the setting where medicinal leeches are sometimes deployed for postoperative venous congestion, but leeches are not mentioned. No data on hirudotherapy, the secretome, or venous-congestion management are provided. The study is limited to surgical technique outcomes from a single surgeon's experience.

Citación

Three end-to-end techniques for microvascular anastomosis of vessels with different size discrepancy.

Zhang Y et al. · Annals of plastic surgery, 2020

Contexto clínico relacionado

Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.