Comparing digital replantation versus revision amputation patient reported outcomes for traumatic digital amputations of the hand: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Adults with traumatic digital amputation (TDA) of the hand may be managed with replantation or revision amputation. To date, there is no systematic review evaluating patient reported outcomes (PROs) comparing replantation versus revision amputation. METHODS: Three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed) were systematically searched in duplicate from inception until June 13, 2019 using Covidence software. Studies comparing replantation versus revision amputation outcomes were considered for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using Methodologic Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Data were pooled in a random-effects meta-analysis model using Revman software. Certainty of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). RESULTS: Of 4350 studies identified, 12 retrospective cohort studies met inclusion criteria and compared TDA outcomes for replantation (n = 717; 82.9% male; mean age 40.3) versus revision amputation (n = 1046; 79.8% male; mean age 41.7). The overall replantation survival rate was 85.3%. The average MINORS score was 57% (13.75/24). Replantation of the thumb had a superior Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) score (+11.88, 95% CI [7.78-15.99], I2 = 21%) compared with revision amputation. Replantation of single non-thumb digits had a superior MHQ score (+5.31, 95% CI [3.10-7.51], I2 = 67%) and Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score (-5.16, 95% CI [-8.27 to -2.06], I2 = 0%) compared with revision amputation. Most patients in the meta-analysis were from Asian populations (87.9%). CONCLUSION: There is low-quality evidence that thumb replantation achieves superior PROs compared with revision amputation, which may be clinically important. Replantation of single non-thumb digits also yielded superior PROs, which is likely not clinically important and based on very low-quality evidence. Future studies with populations outside Asia are required to determine if PROs vary based on cultural differences toward digital amputation.

Resumen tomado de PubMed (NCBI) para el registro citado, en el idioma original. La versión de referencia es la de la publicación original.

El resumen se deja sin traducir para conservar la redacción original de los autores.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 retrospective studies found low-quality evidence that thumb replantation achieves better patient-reported outcomes than revision amputation; single non-thumb replantation also scored higher, though this difference is likely not clinically meaningful and rests on very low-quality evidence.

Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica

Más estudios revisados por pares en la categoría «Literatura clínica».

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Efectos de la hirudoterapia sobre las funciones hepáticas, el perfil lipídico y la sensibilidad a la insulina en ratas con síndrome metabólico — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Eficacia y seguridad de la hirudoterapia para mejorar los parámetros de calidad espermática en la infertilidad masculina: un ensayo controlado aleatorizado — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Congestión venosa de un colgajo sural reverso manejada con éxito con enoxaparina en un paciente varón con lesión traumática por aplastamiento del pie: un caso clínico — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigación de los efectos terapéuticos del tratamiento con sanguijuelas medicinales sobre la lesión por isquemia-reperfusión de la extremidad inferior — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Eficacia de la terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales en diversas aplicaciones clínicas: un estudio exhaustivo de Azerbaiyán — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• Hirudoterapia en cirugía reconstructiva: casos clínicos y revisión — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudoterapia en la cicatrización de heridas — Nair H et al. (2022)
• Hirudoterapia para la isquemia de las extremidades en la unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos: una cohorte observacional retrospectiva — Resch J et al. (2022)

Ver toda la investigación analizada por la ASH →