Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

What Are the Optimal Monitoring Techniques in Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction?

Review published in ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties (2016)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewEnsayos clínicosMoubayed et al. · ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties, 2016

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the outcomes for widely used systems in terms of accuracy, salvage rates, and added cost compared to conventional monitoring. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the literature (high-impact report). RESULTS: The overall free flap success for head and neck reconstruction is at least 95% using any type of monitoring. Salvage rates in decreasing frequency of monitoring techniques are 85% with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), 81% with implantable Doppler, and 61.5% with conventional monitoring. False-positive rates in increasing frequency are 0% for NIRS, 0.4% for conventional monitoring, and <10% for implantable Doppler. Current data show implantable Doppler to be potentially cost-effective for institutions with a failure rate of at least 6%. Buried flaps may be monitored with conventional monitoring using an exteriorized paddle, or using implantable Doppler. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of advanced flap monitoring systems beyond conventional monitoring is related to the success rate of each institution. Cost-effectiveness studies are necessary to determine at what point NIRS becomes advantageous.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsHeadHumansMicrovesselsMonitoring, PhysiologicNeckPlastic Surgery ProceduresSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredSurgical FlapsUltrasonography, DopplerVascular Surgical Procedures

Resumen

We evaluated the outcomes for widely used systems in terms of accuracy, salvage rates, and added cost compared to conventional monitoring. We performed a narrative review of the literature (high-impact report).

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This review evaluated monitoring systems for free flaps in head and neck reconstruction, comparing near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), implantable Doppler, and conventional monitoring in terms of accuracy, salvage rates, false-positive rates, and cost-effectiveness. The overall free flap success rate was reported as at least 95% regardless of monitoring type, with NIRS showing the highest salvage rate (85%) and zero false positives, while implantable Doppler was potentially cost-effective at institutional failure rates of at least 6%. The abstract does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, venous congestion, or any connection to the leech secretome. There is no defensible leech link in this article.

Citación

What Are the Optimal Monitoring Techniques in Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction?

Moubayed et al. · ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties, 2016

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 28, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.