Is There Bias against Simulation in Microsurgery Training?
Survey study published in J Reconstr Microsurg (2016)
Abstract
Background While other surgical specialties have embraced virtual reality simulation for training and recertification, microsurgery has lagged. This study aims to assess the opinions of microsurgeons on the role of simulation in microsurgery assessment and training. Methods We surveyed faculty members of the American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery to ascertain opinions on their use of simulation in training and opinions about the utility of simulation for skills acquisition, teaching, and skills assessment. The 21-question survey was disseminated online to 675 members. Results Eighty-nine members completed the survey for a 13.2% response rate. Few microsurgeons have experience with high-fidelity simulation, and opinions on its utility are internally inconsistent. Although 84% of respondents could not identify a reason why simulation would not be useful, only 24% believed simulation is a useful measure of clinical performance. Nearly three-fourths of respondents were skeptical that simulation would improve their skills. Ninety-four percent had no experience with simulator-based assessment. Conclusion Simulation has been shown to improve skills acquisition in microsurgery, but our survey suggests that unfamiliarity may foster bias against the technology. Failure to incorporate simulation may adversely affect training and may put surgeons at a disadvantage should these technologies be adopted for recertification by regulatory agencies.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Survey of 89 microsurgeons revealed that despite known utility of simulation, only 24% believed simulation measures clinical performance and 94% had no experience with simulator-based assessment.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio encuestó a miembros de la facultad de la American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery para evaluar las opiniones sobre el papel de la simulación en la evaluación y formación en microcirugía, encontrando que pocos microcirujanos tienen experiencia con simulación de alta fidelidad y que el desconocimiento puede generar sesgos contra la tecnología. La encuesta de 89 encuestados reveló que, aunque el 84% no pudo identificar una razón por la que la simulación no sería útil, solo el 24% creía que es una medida útil del rendimiento clínico. Este artículo no tiene relevancia directa para la hirudoterapia, el secretoma de la sanguijuela ni el ámbito de la American Society of Hirudotherapy: se trata puramente de una encuesta de opinión sobre herramientas de simulación educativa y no contiene ninguna mención a sanguijuelas, compuestos derivados de sanguijuelas ni técnicas de hirudoterapia.
Citación
Is There Bias against Simulation in Microsurgery Training?
Theman TA, Labow BI · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 2016
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026