Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Bivalirudin plus a high-dose infusion versus heparin monotherapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised trial

Randomized controlled trial published in Lancet (2022)

Última actualización: 18 de junio de 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Artículo de investigación — revisión de evidenciaReferencia del artículo
Evidence: Randomized controlled trialDesarrollo de fármacosEnsayos clínicosLi Y et al. · Lancet, 2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous randomised trials of bivalirudin versus heparin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have reported conflicting results, in part because of treatment with different pharmacological regimens. We designed a large-scale trial examining bivalirudin with a post-PCI high-dose infusion compared with heparin alone, the regimens that previous studies have shown to have the best balance of safety and efficacy. METHODS: BRIGHT-4 was an investigator-initiated, open-label, randomised controlled trial conducted at 87 clinical centres in 63 cities in China. Patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI with radial artery access within 48 h of symptom onset who had not received previous fibrinolytic therapy, anticoagulants, or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive bivalirudin with a post-PCI high-dose infusion for 2-4 h or unfractionated heparin monotherapy. There was no masking. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use was reserved for procedural thrombotic complications in both groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3-5 bleeding at 30 days. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03822975), and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Feb 14, 2019, and April 7, 2022, a total of 6016 patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were randomly assigned to receive either bivalirudin plus a high-dose infusion after PCI (n=3009) or unfractionated heparin monotherapy (n=3007). Radial artery access was used in 5593 (93·1%) of 6008 patients. Compared with heparin monotherapy, bivalirudin reduced the 30-day rate of the primary endpoint (132 events [4·39%] in the heparin group vs 92 events [3·06%] in the bivalirudin group; difference, 1·33%, 95% CI 0·38-2·29%; hazard ratio [HR] 0·69, 95% CI 0·53-0·91; p=0·0070). All-cause mortality within 30 days occurred in 118 (3·92%) heparin-assigned patients and in 89 (2·96%) bivalirudin-assigned patients (HR 0·75; 95% CI 0·57-0·99; p=0·0420), and BARC types 3-5 bleeding occurred in 24 (0·80%) heparin-assigned patients and five (0·17%) bivalirudin-assigned patients (HR 0·21; 95% CI 0·08-0·54; p=0·0014). There were no significant differences in the 30-day rates of reinfarction, stroke, or ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation between the groups. Within 30 days, stent thrombosis occurred in 11 (0·37%) of bivalirudin-assigned patients and 33 (1·10%) of heparin-assigned patients (p=0·0015). INTERPRETATION: In patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI predominantly with radial artery access, anticoagulation with bivalirudin plus a post-PCI high-dose infusion for 2-4 h significantly reduced the 30-day composite rate of all-cause mortality or BARC types 3-5 major bleeding compared with heparin monotherapy. FUNDING: Chinese Society of Cardiology Foundation (CSCF2019A01), and a research grant from Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeRandomized Controlled TrialJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansHeparinPercutaneous Coronary InterventionST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionMyocardial InfarctionDrug Therapy, CombinationPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexHemorrhageThrombosisHirudinsPeptide FragmentsRecombinant Proteins

Resumen

BRIGHT-4 randomized 6016 STEMI patients to bivalirudin plus post-PCI high-dose infusion vs heparin monotherapy; primary endpoint at 30 days reduced 3.06% vs 4.39% with bivalirudin (HR 0.69).

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

El ensayo aleatorizado BRIGHT-4 comparó bivalirudina más una infusión post-ICP a dosis alta frente a la monoterapia con heparina en 6.016 pacientes con infarto de miocardio con elevación del segmento ST sometidos a intervención coronaria percutánea primaria predominantemente por acceso radial. La bivalirudina redujo significativamente el compuesto a 30 días de mortalidad por todas las causas o sangrado BARC 3–5 (3,06% vs. 4,39%; HR 0,69; P = 0,007), con menor mortalidad por todas las causas (2,96% vs. 3,92%; HR 0,75; P = 0,042) y menor trombosis del stent (0,37% vs. 1,10%; P = 0,0015). El resumen no contiene ninguna mención de sanguijuelas, hirudoterapia o cualquier compuesto derivado de sanguijuelas, y no se puede inferir ninguna conexión defendible con el ámbito de la ASH. Se trata puramente de un ensayo de cardiología que compara dos regímenes anticoagulantes.

Citación

Bivalirudin plus a high-dose infusion versus heparin monotherapy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised trial.

Li Y et al. · Lancet, 2022

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.