Comparisons of medicinal leech therapy with venous catheterization in the treatment of venous congestion of the sural flap
RCT published in Microsurgery (2010)
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The originally described distally based sural flap technique has a risk of partial or total flap necrosis as high as 25%. The purpose of this study was to compare the medicinal leech therapy (MLT) with venous catheterization (VC) for blood volume removal, infection, wound dehiscence, and flap necrosis in the distally based sural flap with venous congestion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six conventional distally based sural flaps with venous congestion during reconstructive surgeries were randomly divided into two groups, MLT group and VC group. The results of comparisons were analyzed using SPSS software (SPSS for Windows Ver.11.5). RESULTS: There were significant differences in terms of the average volume of removed blood (53.6cc vs.172.2cc), infection (10.7% vs. 34.6%), wound dehiscence (10.7% vs. 42.3%), flap necrosis (3.6% vs. 19.2%), and nursing (7.8 vs. 5.19) and patient's satisfaction (8.03 vs. 5.6) in the VC group and MLT group, respectively. Although local heparin irrigation was performed in the VC group, the catheter was exchanged in 10 patients due to obstruction by clot. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that the VC be used for congested pedicled flaps instead of leech therapy, as VC is more effective, easy, and safe in blood removal, and it has less complication.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
RCT in 56 distally based sural flaps comparing leech therapy versus venous catheterization showed VC superior for blood removal (172.2 vs 53.6 cc), lower infection (10.7% vs 34.6%), dehiscence (10.7% vs 42.3%) and flap necrosis (3.6% vs 19.2%).
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este ensayo controlado aleatorizado comparó la terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales (MLT) con el cateterismo venoso (VC) para el tratamiento de la congestión venosa en 56 colgajos surales distales, evaluando el volumen de sangre extraído, infección, dehiscencia de la herida y necrosis del colgajo. La MLT extrajo en promedio más volumen sanguíneo (172,2 cc) que la VC (53,6 cc); sin embargo, la VC presentó menores tasas de infección (10,7% vs. 34,6%), dehiscencia de la herida (10,7% vs. 42,3%) y necrosis del colgajo (3,6% vs. 19,2%). Los autores concluyeron que la VC es más efectiva, más sencilla y más segura que la terapia con sanguijuelas para los colgajos pediculados congestionados. Este estudio es directamente relevante para ASH ya que proporciona datos clínicos comparativos aleatorizados sobre la eficacia y complicaciones de la terapia con sanguijuelas frente a una alternativa mecánica, sugiriendo limitaciones específicas de la MLT en este contexto quirúrgico.
Citación
Comparisons of medicinal leech therapy with venous catheterization in the treatment of venous congestion of the sural flap.
Mozafari N et al. · Microsurgery, 2010
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026