Overtreatment of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in the Surgical ICU
Research article published in Critical care medicine (2017)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recent studies reveal a high occurrence of overdiagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in surgical patients with critical illness. The optimal criteria for diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia remain unclear, contributing to unnecessary treatment. We reviewed patients who were admitted to surgical ICUs and were suspected of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia to identify how often patients were correctly treated. DESIGN: In this clinical prospective study, data were collected including age, sex, antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, serotonin release assay, and Warkentin 4Ts scores. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-positive patients were defined as those with both positive antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (optical density, ≥ 0.40) and positive serotonin release assay results. SETTING: Urban tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the surgical and cardiac ICU who were presumed to have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and underwent antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and serotonin release assay testing between January 1, 2011, and August 1, 2014. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 135 patients had 4Ts, antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and serotonin release assay scores. A total of 11 patients (8.1%) had positive serotonin release assay and 80 patients had positive antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; 10 patients were identified as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia positive. Positive serotonin release assay was noted in nine of 11 patients (81.8%) with antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay optical density greater than or equal to 2.0, compared with one of 22 patients (4.5%) with optical density values of 0.85-1.99, and one of 102 patients (1.0%) with optical density values of 0-0.84. Out of 135 patients, 29 patients (21.5%) received treatment with argatroban, lepirudin, or fondaparinux: 10 of 10 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-positive patients (100%) compared with 19 of 125 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia-negative patients (15%). CONCLUSIONS: Overtreatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the surgical ICU continues even with recent increased caution encouraging a higher antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay optical density threshold before initiating treatment. More stringent criteria should be used to determine when to order serologic testing and when the results of such testing should prompt a change in anticoagulant treatment. If antiplatelet factor 4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay is used to consider immediate treatment, an optical density greater than or equal to 2.0 may be a more appropriate threshold.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Overtreatment of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in the Surgical ICU.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio prospectivo examinó 135 pacientes quirúrgicos y de UCI cardíaca con sospecha de trombocitopenia inducida por heparina (TIH) para evaluar la precisión del diagnóstico y el tratamiento. El estudio halló que el 15 % de los pacientes con TIH negativa recibieron tratamiento innecesario con un grupo de anticoagulantes que incluía argatroban, lepirudina o fondaparinux, lo que pone de relieve un sobretratamiento continuo. El resumen no identifica qué fármacos específicos se administraron a los pacientes con TIH negativa y no aporta información sobre el origen de los medicamentos ni sobre ninguna conexión con sanguijuelas, hirudina o hirudoterapia. En consecuencia, este artículo no posee una relevancia defendible para el ámbito de ASH sobre la hirudoterapia o el secretoma de la sanguijuela.
Citación
Overtreatment of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in the Surgical ICU
Harada MY et al. · Critical care medicine, 2017
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026