Beyond Borders: A Global Microsurgery Training and Case Exposure Survey
Survey published in J Reconstr Microsurg (2023)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microsurgery is essential in modern reconstructive surgery and plastic surgery training. Surgeon's proficiency and experience are crucial for effective microsurgical interventions. Despite anecdotal evidence of varying quality of microsurgery training globally, no empirical studies have investigated this. We conducted a global survey to investigate microsurgical training and clinical case exposure among plastic surgery trainees worldwide. METHODS: An online survey was conducted using a secure platform to gather information on microsurgical case exposure and training among plastic surgery trainees between August 2020 and April 2021. Participants provided consent and completed a 37-question survey across four themes: clinical caseload, surgical exposure to microsurgery, microsurgical simulation training exposure, and barriers and opportunities. RESULTS: A total of 202 responses were received, with most respondents in formal training programs (86.7%). The data highlighted regional variation in microsurgery case indications and flap types, with North America and Europe exhibiting the highest activity levels in microsurgery. Trainees in Asia have the highest cumulative practical exposure in microsurgery, followed by Australia and Oceania, and North America. Only 39.6% of respondents reported formal microsurgical simulation training, and almost one-third (29.7%) received no simulation training. Trainee access to practical experience is limited by several factors, including insufficient time and procedure complexity. Notably, practical experience was most commonly denied without reason being given. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights significant disparities in microsurgical training and exposure among plastic surgery trainees globally. Further research is needed to identify strategies for addressing these issues, given the growing demand for complex reconstructive microsurgery and its impact on health care inequalities.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Global survey of 202 plastic surgery trainees showed Asian trainees have highest cumulative practical microsurgery exposure; only 39.6% reported formal simulation training and 29.7% received none.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio realizó una encuesta global a 202 residentes de cirugía plástica para investigar las disparidades en la formación microquirúrgica, la exposición a casos clínicos y el acceso a simulación entre las distintas regiones. Los hallazgos revelaron una variación regional significativa en las indicaciones de casos y los tipos de colgajos, y solo el 39,6% de los encuestados refirió contar con formación formal mediante simulación, mientras que casi un tercio no recibía ninguna. Este artículo no tiene relevancia directa para la hirudoterapia, el secreción de la sanguijuela ni el ámbito de la American Society of Hirudotherapy: se centra por completo en la exposición a casos quirúrgicos y las disparidades educativas, y no contiene ninguna mención a sanguijuelas, compuestos derivados de sanguijuelas o técnicas de hirudoterapia.
Citación
Beyond Borders: A Global Microsurgery Training and Case Exposure Survey.
Chang C et al. · Journal of reconstructive microsurgery, 2023
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026