Impact of sex on comparative outcomes of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a pre-specified analysis of the MATRIX trial
Randomized controlled trial published in EuroIntervention (2019)
Abstract
AIMS: Our aim was to assess whether bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) is associated with consistent outcomes in males and females with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing invasive management. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the MATRIX programme, 7,213 patients were randomised to bivalirudin or UFH. Patients in the bivalirudin group were subsequently randomly assigned to receive or not a post-PCI bivalirudin infusion. The 30-day co-primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as MACE or major bleeding. The primary outcome for the comparison of a post-PCI bivalirudin infusion with no post-PCI infusion was a composite of urgent target vessel revascularisation (TVR), definite stent thrombosis (ST), or NACE. The rate of MACE was not significantly lower with bivalirudin than with heparin in male (rate ratio [RR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-1.07; p=0.22) and female patients (RR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.80-1.40; p=0.67) without significant interaction (pint=0.31), nor was the rate of NACE (males: RR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-1.01; p=0.07; females: RR 0.98, 95% CI: 0.76-1.28; p=0.91; pint=0.38). Post-PCI bivalirudin infusion, as compared with no infusion, did not significantly decrease the rate of urgent TVR, definite ST, or NACE (males: RR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.66-1.07; p=0.15; females: RR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.74-1.53; p=0.74; pint=0.28). CONCLUSIONS: In ACS patients, the rates of MACE and NACE were not significantly lower with bivalirudin than with UFH in both sexes. The rate of the composite of urgent TVR, definite ST, or NACE was not significantly lower with a post-PCI bivalirudin infusion than with no post-PCI infusion in both sexes.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Our aim was to assess whether bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) is associated with consistent outcomes in males and females with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing invasive management.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este análisis de subgrupos preespecificado del ensayo aleatorizado MATRIX (n=7.213) evaluó si la bivalirudina frente a la heparina no fraccionada produjo resultados consistentes en pacientes masculinos y femeninos con SCA sometidos a manejo invasivo. Ni las tasas de MACE ni de NACE fueron significativamente inferiores con bivalirudina en ninguno de los sexos, y no hubo una interacción significativa sexo-por-tratamiento; la infusión de bivalirudina post-ICP tampoco mostró un beneficio significativo en ninguno de los sexos. La relevancia para ASH es indirecta: la bivalirudina es un inhibidor directo de la trombina derivado de la hirudina, y los datos de desenlaces cardiovasculares a gran escala sobre tales agentes contribuyen a informar la comprensión de la clase farmacológica de anticoagulantes inspirada en la sanguijuela. Sin embargo, este estudio no involucra terapia con sanguijuelas ni preparaciones del secretoma de la sanguijuela, y la ausencia de un beneficio significativo de la bivalirudina sobre la heparina en esta población constituye un hallazgo notable que modera el entusiasmo por esta clase farmacológica en este contexto clínico específico.
Citación
Impact of sex on comparative outcomes of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a pre-specified analysis of the MATRIX trial.
Gargiulo G et al. · EuroIntervention, 2019
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026