Microsurgical ear replantation without venous repair: failure of development of venous channels despite patency of arterial anastomosis for 14 days
Case report published in Ann Plast Surg (2001)
Abstract
The authors describe a case of microvascular ear replantation with repair of the artery only and medicinal leech therapy that survived for 14 days but ultimately failed as a result of the absence of development of venous channels between the replant and the recipient bed. A 35-year-old man presented with complete avulsion of 80% of the right external ear. The auricle was revascularized successfully via transposition of the superficial temporal artery (STA) and end-to-end anastomosis between the STA and an identified arterial branch on the posterior surface of the ear, using the technique of longitudinal wedge resection. No suitable veins could be found, therefore medicinal leech therapy was used for venous drainage as well as for systemic heparinization. Although the replant remained viable, frequency of leeching did not decrease over 2 weeks. On postoperative day 14, despite obvious viability of the replanted ear, leeching was stopped, considering the ongoing blood loss. Unfortunately, the auricle was found to be necrosed totally the following day. In retrospect, the authors think that inadequate debridement of nonvital tissues may have led to the failure of development of venous channels between the replant and the recipient bed, as manifested by the frequent requirement of leeching to relieve venous congestion long after revascularization. They conclude that the importance of thorough debridement cannot be overemphasized in microsurgical ear replantation with no vein anastomosis, as demonstrated in their patient. From the point of view of creation of venous drainage channels, deepithelialization of the posterior ear skin may be beneficial.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Avulsed ear in 35-year-old male revascularized via single arterial anastomosis with leech therapy for 14 days; auricle necrosed due to absent venous channel development.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este caso clínico describe a un varón de 35 años sometido a reimplante microvascular de oreja con reparación únicamente arterial e hirudoterapia medicinal complementaria para el drenaje venoso, sobreviviendo el reimplante 14 días antes de fracasar por ausencia de desarrollo de canales venosos. El caso es directamente relevante para la hirudoterapia, ya que ilustra tanto el uso como las limitaciones de la terapia con sanguijuelas en el mantenimiento de la viabilidad tisular cuando la reparación venosa no es posible. Los autores atribuyen el fracaso a un desbridamiento inadecuado que impidió el crecimiento venoso, señalando que la frecuencia de aplicación de sanguijuelas no disminuyó durante dos semanas y que la pérdida sanguínea continua hizo necesario suspender el tratamiento. Se trata de un caso clínico aislado y, aunque aporta perspectivas prácticas sobre los límites del drenaje venoso dependiente de sanguijuelas, no pueden extraerse conclusiones generalizables a partir de esta única experiencia.
Citación
Microsurgical ear replantation without venous repair: failure of development of venous channels despite patency of arterial anastomosis for 14 days.
Akyurek M et al. · Annals of plastic surgery, 2001
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026