Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

A multifaceted approach for traumatic auricular avulsion with venous congestion

Case report published in Harefuah (2020)

Última actualización: June 18, 2026Revisado por: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportEnsayos clínicosGross E et al. · Harefuah, 2020

Abstract

Choice of operative technique is often a major factor in the success of replantation of traumatic avulsions of the auricle. While microsurgery is considered to produce the best aesthetic results, this approach may not be an option due to vascular damage. We present the case of a 66-year-old Caucasian male with a subtotal traumatic left auricle avulsion. Microsurgical repair was not attempted as vessels amenable to anastomosis could not be found. Instead, the auricle was replanted in a non-microsurgical manner as a composite graft using Monocryl sutures. As a preventative measure for clot formation heparin was injected intradermally throughout the anterior auricular surface and helix. Twenty-four hours postoperatively, as signs of venous congestion were noted, a multimodal therapy was initiated combining mechanical, chemical and biological therapies. Medicinal leech therapy (hirudotherapy) was used to enhance venous drainage and prevent clot formation. Hirudotherapy is an effective and safe treatment modality for venous outflow obstruction in avulsed auricle injuries. However, one must consider the possible complications of leech therapy and the need for close monitoring. An examination conducted two months following the initial injury revealed optimal patient outcomes with excellent aesthetic results and full auricular sensation. Good vascular outflow is integral to the successful salvage of replanted tissues. Venous stasis must be identified and addressed early for good patient outcomes. The current report highlights the importance of a multifaceted approach in cases of traumatic auricular avulsions followed by venous congestion.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAgedAmputation, TraumaticAnastomosis, SurgicalHumansHyperemiaMaleMicrosurgeryReplantation

Resumen

Hebrew-language case detailing combined operative and adjunctive management of severe venous congestion after auricular avulsion repair, including hyperbaric oxygen, anticoagulation, and medicinal leech therapy.

Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia

This case report describes a 66-year-old man with subtotal traumatic auricular avulsion managed by non-microsurgical replantation as a composite graft, as no vessels amenable to anastomosis could be found. Intradermal heparin was injected to prevent clot formation; when venous congestion appeared 24 hours postoperatively, multimodal therapy was initiated including medicinal leech therapy (hirudotherapy) to enhance venous drainage and prevent clotting. At two-month follow-up, excellent aesthetic results and full auricular sensation were achieved. For ASH's domain, this provides direct clinical evidence supporting hirudotherapy as an effective and safe modality for venous outflow obstruction in avulsed auricular tissue. Caveat: This is a single case report without a control group; the abstract notes that possible complications of leech therapy and the need for close monitoring must be considered.

Citación

A multifaceted approach for traumatic auricular avulsion with venous congestion.

Gross E et al. · Harefuah, 2020

Contexto clínico relacionado

Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 27, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: June 18, 2026

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.