Poly-paraphyly of Hirudinidae: many lineages of medicinal leeches
Phylogenetics article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology (2009)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medicinal leeches became infamous for their utility in bloodletting popularized in the 19th century, and have seen a recent resurgence in post-operative treatments for flap and replantation surgeries, and in terms of characterization of salivary anticoagulants. Notorious throughout the world, the quintessential leech family Hirudinidae has been taken for granted to be monophyletic, as has the non-bloodfeeding family Haemopidae. RESULTS: This study is the first to evaluate molecular evidence from hirudinid and haemopid leeches in a manner that encompasses the global scope of their taxonomic distributions. We evaluated the presumed monophyly of the Hirudinidae and assessed previous well-accepted classification schemes. The Hirudinidae were found not to be monophyletic, falling instead into two distinct and unrelated clades. Members of the non-bloodfeeding family Haemopidae were scattered throughout the tree and among traditional hirudinid genera. A combination of nuclear 18S rDNA and 28S rDNA with mitochondrial 12S rDNA and cytochrome c oxidase I were analyzed with Parsimony and with Bayesian methods. CONCLUSION: The family Hirudinidae must be refined to include only the clade containing Hirudo medicinalis (European medicinal leech) and related leeches irrespective of bloodfeeding behavior. A second clade containing Macrobdella decora (North American medicinal leech) and its relatives may yet be recognized in Semiscolecidae in order to avoid paraphyly. The African distribution of species from each of the divergent hirudinid clades suggests that a deep divergence took place in the history of the medicinal leeches hundreds of millions of years ago.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Resumen
Combined nuclear (18S, 28S) and mitochondrial (12S, COI) phylogenetic analysis demonstrates Hirudinidae are not monophyletic but fall into two distinct clades, with implications for understanding the evolution of medicinal leech bloodfeeding.
Por qué esto importa para la hirudoterapia
Este estudio filogenético utilizó secuencias de ADNr nuclear 18S y 28S además de ADNr mitocondrial 12S y de citocromo c oxidasa I, analizadas mediante métodos de parsimonia y bayesianos, para poner a prueba la supuesta monofilia de las familias de sanguijuelas Hirudinidae (sanguijuelas medicinales) y Haemopidae a lo largo de sus distribuciones globales. Se encontró que las Hirudinidae no son monofiléticas, dividiéndose en dos clados distintos —uno que contiene a Hirudo medicinalis y parientes, y otro que contiene a Macrobdella decora y parientes (potencialmente reconocible como Semiscolecidae)— con las Haemopidae dispersas entre los géneros hirudinidos tradicionales y una antigua divergencia africana sugerida. Para ASH, esto constituye información de base relevante sobre la taxonomía y las relaciones evolutivas de las sanguijuelas medicinales. Salvedad: se trata de un estudio de filogenética molecular/taxonomía sin datos terapéuticos, de secretoma ni de hirudoterapia.
Citación
Poly-paraphyly of Hirudinidae: many lineages of medicinal leeches.
Phillips AJ, Siddall ME · BMC evolutionary biology, 2009
Contexto clínico relacionado
Explore cómo esta investigación se conecta con la práctica clínica
Añadido a la biblioteca ASH: May 26, 2026 · Última actualización del sitio: 18 de junio de 2026