Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Burden of illness of non-hematopoietic stem cell transplant-related hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome: A systematic review

Fan L, Stewart F, Ruiz K, Devani D, Fusco N, Gill M, Amber V, Su W, Gangi A, Hanvesakul R (2024) · Heliyon · n=0

RCT evidence detailTrial reference

Study Profile

Design
systematic review of 92 studies (2002-2023) on non-HCT SOS/VOD burden of illness and management
Sample size (n)
0
Intervention
Defibrotide and other treatments for non-HCT-related sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease
Comparator
Standard of care or natural history
Primary endpoint
Incidence, diagnosis, management, clinical and economic burden of non-HCT SOS/VOD
Primary result
Non-HCT SOS/VOD occurs in ~35% of oxaliplatin-treated colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients and ~5% of acute leukemia patients; defibrotide most frequently reported treatment; significant unmet need for diagnostic and treatment guidelines
Follow-up duration
Variable across included studies (2002-2023 window)

Key Findings

  • 35% non-HCT SOS/VOD incidence in oxaliplatin-treated CRLM patients
  • 5% incidence in acute lymphoblastic and acute myeloid leukemia
  • Defibrotide most frequently reported treatment
  • Wide diagnostic criteria variability across disease settings
  • Identifies unmet need for guidelines

Limitations

  • 57% retrospective cohort studies (low evidence quality)
  • Industry-affiliated authorship (Jazz Pharmaceuticals)
  • Excluded pulmonary VOD and pyrrolizidine alkaloid cases
  • Methodological quality varied across included studies
  • Not applicable to whole-leech hirudotherapy

Clinical Implications

Fan 2024 quantifies the substantial off-label use of defibrotide for non-HSCT VOD, particularly in oncology populations. For ASH, this systematic review illustrates how the pharmaceutical pathway expands beyond approved indications through clinical adoption rather than regulatory action - a phenomenon also visible in the K040187 device-leech US clinical practice but with different scale and economic implications.

Related Trials

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Zulassung für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.