Американское общество гирудотерапии

How ASH grades evidence

The Tier A/B/C framework and GRADE-aligned ratings used across every page.

Последнее обновление: May 27, 2026Рецензент: Andrei Dokukin, MD
Editorial methodologyReference framework

Every condition, RCT, compound, and biographical entry on hirudotherapysociety.org carries a regulatory-status badge (the colored tag near the page title) and, where applicable, an evidence-quality rating. This page explains what those badges mean.

The three-tier framework

ASH classifies every clinical use of medicinal leech therapy into one of three tiers:

Tier A

FDA-cleared

The FDA has cleared Hirudo medicinalis as a medical device (K040187, June 21 2004) for venous congestion in surgical flaps. This is the only formally cleared indication. Tier A entries can refer to this clearance without off-label disclaimers.

Example: Venous Congestion in Surgical Flaps, Digit Replantation,Ear Replantation.

Tier B

Off-label with clinical evidence

Uses outside the FDA-cleared indication that have at least one randomized controlled trial (RCT) or systematic review supporting clinical efficacy. Includes off-label disclaimer language and individualized informed-consent expectation.

Example: Knee Osteoarthritis (multiple RCTs), Chronic Venous Insufficiency, Lateral Epicondylitis.

Tier C

Investigational

Mechanistic rationale and limited human evidence (case series, small pilots, or preclinical extrapolation). Tier C entries include explicit framing that hirudotherapy is investigational for this use, with patient-discussion expectations covering evidence limits.

Example: Fibromyalgia, Vitiligo, Chronic Tinnitus,Stroke Rehabilitation.

Non-clinical

Preclinical / Mechanistic

Pages describing biology, biochemistry, mechanism-of-action research, or omics discovery science. Not a clinical efficacy claim. Common in /science/*,/leech-biology/*, and /research/genome*.

GRADE-aligned evidence ratings

On RCT pages, the evidence-quality badge follows the GRADE Working Group framework. Trial design alone doesn't determine grade \u2014 size, blinding, and consistency all matter.

FDA-cleared context (highest)

Sources from FDA 510(k) submission file. Top tier for regulatory framing.

Systematic review / meta-analysis

Aggregates multiple RCTs with quality assessment. Used for top-of-page recommendations.

Randomized controlled trial

Single-trial evidence. May be downgraded for small N, unblinded design, or selection bias.

Cohort / case series

Observational design. Suggests effect but does not establish causation.

Case report

Single-patient observation. Hypothesis-generating only.

Preclinical (animal)

In-vivo animal model. Suggests biological plausibility, not human efficacy.

In vitro

Cell-culture or cell-free assay. Mechanism-of-action evidence only.

Mechanistic

Biochemistry, structural biology, computational modeling. Pre-clinical context.

Historical

Pre-modern medical literature. Educational reference, not current clinical guidance.

Clinical guideline

Practice guideline or scope-of-practice statement from a professional society.

Editorial integrity

  • PMID verification: Every PMID cited is verified to resolve to a real PubMed paper with title matching the claim. Three fabricated PMIDs were caught and corrected in May 2026 \u2014 documented in the public changelog.
  • "What this does NOT mean" required: Every Tier B/C condition page carries an explicit WhatThisDoesNotMeanBox clarifying evidence limits in patient language.
  • FDA framing fixed-baseline: Every Tier A page references the exact device clearance (K040187, NRN, Unclassified Pre-Amendment). No inflated claims.
  • Drug-vs-leech distinction: FDA-approved drugs derived from leech (bivalirudin, lepirudin, desirudin) are NOT the same as whole-leech therapy. Pages describing the drugs carry explicit separation.
  • Public corrections queue: Errata are logged in the changelog, not silently revised. All commit history is on public GitHub.

Related pages

Coverage Map

Tier and organ-system distribution across the conditions registry.

View map →

Clinical Knowledge Support

Tier-based framework for clinicians considering hirudotherapy.

Framework →

Editorial Policy

Independence, conflict-of-interest framework, source standards.

Policy →

Этот сайт предоставляет образовательную информацию и не является медицинской консультацией, диагнозом или рекомендацией по лечению. Гирудотерапия сопряжена с клинически значимыми рисками и должна проводиться только квалифицированными клиницистами в рамках институционально утверждённых протоколов. Разрешение FDA 510(k) для медицинских пиявок ограничено определёнными показаниями; обсуждения исследовательского и нелицензионного применения отмечены соответствующим образом. Для индивидуальных медицинских рекомендаций обратитесь к квалифицированному медицинскому специалисту.