Sociedad Americana de Hirudoterapia

Study of the effect of leeching on plasma endothelin and soluble interleukin-2 receptor in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Cheng SP, Liu JL, Yuan J (2005) · Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine · n=44

Detalle de evidencia de RCTReferencia del ensayo
GRADE muy bajaEvidencia insuficienteCondición: Knee Osteoarthritis →
Tamaño de muestra de este ensayo en comparación con otros ensayos de Knee OsteoarthritisWang H 2018264Lauche R 2025240Lauche R 2014237Lauche R 2014237Farzali S 2025181Cui Y 2024144Andereya S 2008113Andereya S 2008113Isik M 201790Cheng SP 200544
Este ensayo (destacado) por tamaño de muestra junto a otros ensayos indexados de Knee Osteoarthritis. Los ensayos más grandes generalmente tienen mayor peso estadístico.

Perfil del estudio

Diseño
single-center, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial of leeching as an add-on to conventional corticosteroid therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (People's Hospital of Guizhou Province, China)
Tamaño de la muestra (n)
44
Intervención
Conventional corticosteroid treatment plus leeching intervention (n=24); plasma endothelin and soluble interleukin-2 receptor measured before and after treatment
Comparador
Conventional corticosteroid treatment alone (n=20)
Punto final primario
Plasma endothelin (ET) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) concentrations before and after treatment
Resultado primario
Both groups showed significant improvement in plasma ET and sIL-2R after treatment (p<0.05); the leeching group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement than the conventional-only group (between-group p<0.05); authors concluded that adjunctive leeching improves the level of these biomarkers and may ameliorate renal tissue impairment in SLE
Duración del seguimiento
treatment course duration (specific weeks not reported in abstract)

Hallazgos clave

  • Rare RCT-level evidence for leeching in a systemic autoimmune disease (SLE) context
  • Adjunctive leeching plus conventional corticosteroids produced significantly greater reduction in plasma endothelin and sIL-2R than corticosteroids alone
  • First trial-level data suggesting a biomarker-based anti-inflammatory mechanism for leech therapy in SLE
  • Chinese integrative-medicine context - leeching is part of the recognized traditional therapeutic toolkit
  • Mechanistic relevance to broader autoimmune indications, though the clinical relevance to organ outcomes remains uncertain

Limitaciones

  • Small sample (n=44) limits subgroup and sensitivity analyses
  • Single Chinese center with no Western replication of biomarker findings
  • Surrogate biomarker endpoints (ET, sIL-2R) rather than hard clinical outcomes (renal failure, mortality, flare frequency)
  • Open-label design with no sham control
  • Limited methodological detail on randomization, allocation concealment, and outcome assessment blinding

Implicaciones clínicas

Cheng 2005 is the only PubMed-indexed RCT to test leeching in systemic lupus erythematosus. The biomarker improvements (plasma endothelin and sIL-2R) are mechanistically interesting and consistent with anti-inflammatory and vasodilatory properties of leech saliva. However, the trial does not address hard clinical outcomes (renal failure, mortality, lupus flare frequency) and should be cited only as a hypothesis-generating mechanistic signal rather than as evidence for routine clinical use. For US clinicians, leech therapy in SLE is not a recommended indication and the FDA 510(k) K040187 clearance does not cover this use. The trial is included in the registry for completeness of the international integrative-medicine evidence base.

Estudios relacionados

Este sitio web proporciona información educativa y no constituye consejo médico, diagnóstico ni recomendaciones de tratamiento. La terapia con sanguijuelas medicinales conlleva riesgos clínicamente significativos y debe ser realizada únicamente por profesionales calificados bajo protocolos aprobados institucionalmente. La autorización 510(k) de la FDA para sanguijuelas medicinales se limita a indicaciones específicas; las discusiones sobre uso investigativo y fuera de indicación se señalan correspondientemente. Para orientación médica específica, consulte a un profesional de salud calificado.