Amerikanische Gesellschaft für Hirudotherapie

Study of the effect of leeching on plasma endothelin and soluble interleukin-2 receptor in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Cheng SP, Liu JL, Yuan J (2005) · Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine · n=44

RCT-EvidenzdetailsStudienreferenz
GRADE Sehr niedrigUnzureichende EvidenzZustand: Knee Osteoarthritis →
Stichprobengröße dieser Studie im Vergleich zu anderen Knee Osteoarthritis-StudienWang H 2018264Lauche R 2025240Lauche R 2014237Lauche R 2014237Farzali S 2025181Cui Y 2024144Andereya S 2008113Andereya S 2008113Isik M 201790Cheng SP 200544
Diese Studie (hervorgehoben) nach Stichprobengröße neben anderen indexierten Knee Osteoarthritis-Studien. Größere Studien haben im Allgemeinen ein höheres statistisches Gewicht.

Studienprofil

Design
single-center, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial of leeching as an add-on to conventional corticosteroid therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus (People's Hospital of Guizhou Province, China)
Stichprobengröße (n)
44
Intervention
Conventional corticosteroid treatment plus leeching intervention (n=24); plasma endothelin and soluble interleukin-2 receptor measured before and after treatment
Komparator
Conventional corticosteroid treatment alone (n=20)
Primärer Endpunkt
Plasma endothelin (ET) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) concentrations before and after treatment
Primäres Ergebnis
Both groups showed significant improvement in plasma ET and sIL-2R after treatment (p<0.05); the leeching group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement than the conventional-only group (between-group p<0.05); authors concluded that adjunctive leeching improves the level of these biomarkers and may ameliorate renal tissue impairment in SLE
Follow-up-Dauer
treatment course duration (specific weeks not reported in abstract)

Wichtigste Ergebnisse

  • Rare RCT-level evidence for leeching in a systemic autoimmune disease (SLE) context
  • Adjunctive leeching plus conventional corticosteroids produced significantly greater reduction in plasma endothelin and sIL-2R than corticosteroids alone
  • First trial-level data suggesting a biomarker-based anti-inflammatory mechanism for leech therapy in SLE
  • Chinese integrative-medicine context - leeching is part of the recognized traditional therapeutic toolkit
  • Mechanistic relevance to broader autoimmune indications, though the clinical relevance to organ outcomes remains uncertain

Einschränkungen

  • Small sample (n=44) limits subgroup and sensitivity analyses
  • Single Chinese center with no Western replication of biomarker findings
  • Surrogate biomarker endpoints (ET, sIL-2R) rather than hard clinical outcomes (renal failure, mortality, flare frequency)
  • Open-label design with no sham control
  • Limited methodological detail on randomization, allocation concealment, and outcome assessment blinding

Klinische Implikationen

Cheng 2005 is the only PubMed-indexed RCT to test leeching in systemic lupus erythematosus. The biomarker improvements (plasma endothelin and sIL-2R) are mechanistically interesting and consistent with anti-inflammatory and vasodilatory properties of leech saliva. However, the trial does not address hard clinical outcomes (renal failure, mortality, lupus flare frequency) and should be cited only as a hypothesis-generating mechanistic signal rather than as evidence for routine clinical use. For US clinicians, leech therapy in SLE is not a recommended indication and the FDA 510(k) K040187 clearance does not cover this use. The trial is included in the registry for completeness of the international integrative-medicine evidence base.

Verwandte Studien

Diese Website stellt Bildungsinformationen bereit und ist weder eine medizinische Beratung noch eine Diagnose oder Behandlungsempfehlung. Die medizinische Blutegeltherapie ist mit klinisch relevanten Risiken verbunden und sollte ausschließlich von qualifizierten Klinikerinnen und Klinikern unter institutionell genehmigten Protokollen durchgeführt werden. Die FDA-510(k)-Freigabe für medizinische Blutegel ist auf bestimmte Indikationen beschränkt; experimentelle und Off-Label-Diskussionen werden entsprechend gekennzeichnet. Für patientenspezifische Beratung wenden Sie sich an eine qualifizierte Gesundheitsfachkraft.