Comparison of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin for Maintenance Systemic Anticoagulation During Adult and Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Research article published in Critical care medicine (2021)
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To provide a comparative analysis of conventional heparin-versus bivalirudin-based systemic anticoagulation in adult and pediatric patients supported on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review study of adult and pediatric patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation from January 1, 2014, to October 1, 2019. SETTING: A large, high-volume tertiary referral adult and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation center. PATIENTS: Four hundred twenty-four individuals requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support and systemically anticoagulated with either unfractionated heparin (223 adult and 65 pediatric patients) or bivalirudin (110 adult and 24 pediatric patients) were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Digital data abstraction was used to retrospectively collect patient details. The majority of both groups were cannulated centrally (67%), and the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation type was predominantly venoarterial (84%). The adult bivalirudin group had a greater occurrence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (12% vs 1%; p < 0.01) and was more likely to require postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (36% vs 55%; p < 0.01). There were no statistical differences between the groups in regards to age, sex, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation initiation location. The main finding was a reduced mortality in the adult bivalirudin group (odds ratio, 0.39; p < 0.01), whereas no difference was noted in the pediatric group. A significant reduction in the composite transfusion requirement in the first 24 hours was noted in the pediatric bivaluridin group with an odds ratio of 0.28 (p = 0.02). Groups did not differ in regard to laboratories per day, anticoagulant dose adjustments, or ischemic complications. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with heparin-based systemic anticoagulation, bivalirudin demonstrated feasibility and safety as established by the absence of increases in identifiable adverse outcomes while manifesting substantial improvements in hospital mortality in adult patients. Further studies are necessary to corroborate these findings and further elucidate the role of bivalirudin during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
A retrospective comparison of 424 adult and pediatric ECMO patients found lower mortality with bivalirudin versus heparin in adults (OR 0.39) and, in children, no mortality difference but reduced 24-hour transfusion requirements (OR 0.28).
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This retrospective chart review compared heparin versus bivalirudin for systemic anticoagulation in 424 adult and pediatric patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, finding reduced mortality in the adult bivalirudin group and reduced composite transfusion requirements in the pediatric bivalirudin group within the first 24 hours. The abstract notes that bivalirudin demonstrated feasibility and safety with no increases in identifiable adverse outcomes, while acknowledging further studies are necessary. The abstract contains no mention of hirudin or leeches. As a retrospective analysis, it relies on historical chart data and cannot fully eliminate confounding or establish definitive causality despite the large cohort. Bivalirudin (formerly Hirulog) is a synthetic peptide anticoagulant designed partly on the C-terminal sequence of hirudin, the anticoagulant of the medicinal leech (Maraganore et al., 1990); this paper studies the drug, not leech therapy.
Citation
Reference (Vancouver style)
Seelhammer TG, Bohman JK, Schulte PJ, Hanson AC, Aganga DO. Comparison of Bivalirudin Versus Heparin for Maintenance Systemic Anticoagulation During Adult and Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(9):1481-1492. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005033. PMID: 33870916
Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.
Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026