Hirudin in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a serious side effect of heparin treatment, requires alternative anticoagulation in most affected patients. The recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin) lepirudin has been approved for this purpose after two prospective trials in laboratory-confirmed HIT patients. Other drugs available for this purpose are danaparoid sodium (a heparinoid) and argatroban, a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor. In this article, recommendations for optimal use of r-hirudin in HIT are given, covering therapy in uncomplicated patients as well as in special situations such as heparin reexposure of HIT patients. Because lepirudin's half-life depends on renal function, it may vary between 1 and 200 hours, which requires individual dose adjustments. Lepirudin compares favorably with danaparoid, based on retrospective data. No direct comparisons of lepirudin with argatroban are available, but argatroban might offer advantages in patients with renal failure, because it is mainly eliminated hepatically. Major hemorrhage, the main risk of lepirudin treatment, occurring in about 15% of patients, makes close monitoring important. New monitoring tools, such as the ecarin clotting time (ECT), might further reduce bleeding risks. Antihirudin antibodies, which can alter the pharmacokinetics as well as the pharmacodynamics of hirudin, can also be countered by close monitoring and appropriate dose adjustments. Whereas hirudins have not yet managed to gain importance in non-HIT indications such as unstable coronary syndromes, they have a major role to play in the treatment of HIT. The choice between the available drugs for HIT, namely lepirudin, danaparoid, and argatroban, has to be made according to the clinical presentation of the patient.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Reviewing HIT treatment, the authors describe lepirudin dosing and monitoring (including ecarin clotting time), compare it with danaparoid and argatroban, and emphasize its main bleeding risk (~15%) and need for renal-function-based dose adjustment.

Explore how this research connects to clinical practice

More peer-reviewed studies in Drug Development.

• Hirudotherapy in Medicine and Dentistry — Jha K et al. (2015)
• Leech therapy: a history — Hyson J (2005)
• Hirudins of the Asian medicinal leech, Hirudinaria manillensis: same same, but different — Lukas P et al. (2019)
• Transcriptomic analysis of the salivary gland of medicinal leech Hirudo nipponia — Lu Z et al. (2018)
• Molecular dynamic and pharmacological studies on protein-engineered hirudin variants of Hirudinaria manillensis and Hirudo medicinalis — Sun Y et al. (2022)
• Cell-free synthesis of the hirudin variant 1 of the blood-sucking leech Hirudo medicinalis — Wüstenhagen D et al. (2020)
• Hirudin variants production by genetic engineered microbial factory — Zhang J, Lan N (2018)
• Hirudin ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting Gsdmd-mediated pyroptosis — Han J et al. (2023)
• Hirudin as alternative anticoagulant--a historical review — Markwardt F (2002)
• Hirudin in renal insufficiency — Fischer K (2002)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →