American Society of Hirudotherapy

Resolving Bivalirudin Interference on Fibrinogen Testing by the Use of Activated Carbon

Methodology / laboratory published in J Clin Lab Anal (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentSafety & Infection ControlDu J et al. · Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Direct thrombin inhibitors may lead to falsely low fibrinogen results. The interference of bivalirudin on fibrinogen assays has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study investigates the interference of bivalirudin on fibrinogen detection and the potential use of activated carbon to address this issue. METHODS: Normal pooled plasma from 20 healthy subjects was spiked with increasing bivalirudin concentrations (0-6.4 μg/mL). Interference of bivalirudin on fibrinogen testing was evaluated by comparing three Clauss-method assays (HemosIL Fibrinogen-C XL; STA-Fibrinogen; Dade Thrombin) to an immunoassay (N Antiserum to Human Fibrinogen reagent, NAHF). Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and fibrinogen results were analyzed before and after the addition of activated carbon (AC) to evaluate the absorption of bivalirudin by AC. RESULTS: The NAHF immunoassay remained unaffected by bivalirudin (p = 0.27). All three Clauss-methods assays showed a significant downward trend with the increase of bivalirudin concentration (STA-Fibrinogen: p = 0.012, Dade Thrombin: p < 0.001, Fibrinogen-C XL: p < 0.001). When compared to their respective baselines, STA-Fibrinogen exhibited a reduction of 16%, Dade Thrombin showed a reduction of 40%, and Fibrinogen-C XL displayed a decrease of up to 89%. Neither STA-Fibrinogen nor Dade Thrombin displayed a significant downward trend when the APTT ratio did not exceed 2.5. After the addition of AC, SynthASil APTT and HemosIL Fibrinogen-C XL levels of all samples containing varying concentrations of bivalirudin returned to near baseline. CONCLUSION: The influences of bivalirudin on fibrinogen assays vary significantly. Activated carbon can effectively remove bivalirudin from plasma, thereby eliminating its interference on fibrinogen testing.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHirudinsPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsFibrinogenAntithrombinsBlood Coagulation TestsCharcoalPartial Thromboplastin TimeHumansHealthy Volunteers

Summary

This study shows bivalirudin causes assay-dependent, concentration-dependent underestimation of fibrinogen in three Clauss-method tests but not in an immunoassay, and that adding activated carbon removes bivalirudin from plasma, restoring APTT and Fibrinogen-C XL results to near baseline.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This study investigated bivalirudin interference on fibrinogen testing using pooled plasma from 20 healthy subjects spiked with increasing bivalirudin concentrations (0–6.4 μg/mL), finding that all three Clauss-method assays showed falsely low fibrinogen results (reductions of 16–89%), while an immunoassay was unaffected. Activated carbon effectively removed bivalirudin from plasma, restoring near-baseline APTT and fibrinogen values. Bivalirudin (formerly Hirulog) is a synthetic peptide anticoagulant designed partly on the C-terminal sequence of hirudin, the anticoagulant of the medicinal leech (Maraganore et al., 1990); this paper studies the drug, not leech therapy.

Citation

Reference (Vancouver style)

Du J, Liu H, Liu X, Cao S, Zhang Z, Zhang L. Resolving Bivalirudin Interference on Fibrinogen Testing by the Use of Activated Carbon. J Clin Lab Anal. 2026;40(6):e70184. doi:10.1002/jcla.70184. PMID: 41706049

Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.