American Society of Hirudotherapy

Anticoagulation management and monitoring in ECMO: an international survey from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis and Hemostasis

International survey published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentClinical TrialsRegling K et al. · Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this survey is to assess current practices in anticoagulation management, laboratory monitoring, and hematology involvement in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional international survey distributed between April 2023 to November 2023 to members of Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, and Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. Respondents were pediatric and adult physicians involved in the care of ECMO patients. RESULTS: Seventy-two survey responses were included with 83.3% of respondents being from an Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Institution. The respondents included both adult (41.7%) and pediatric (34.7%) physicians, as well as those who managed all age groups (23.6%). Approximately 53% reported including hematology as part of the care team. However, the majority reported that the hematologist is involved in complex cases only (72.2%). Respondents reported the routine utilization of an anticoagulation protocol (92%) and transfusion protocol (83%) to guide management decisions during ECMO therapy; however, management practices were variable. Both unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin were reported to be used routinely for anticoagulation at 92.2% and 52.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrated that hematology involvement for ECMO patients is still primarily for complicated cases. In addition, unfractionated heparin continued to be the anticoagulant of choice, with no significant changes in laboratory monitoring. Most centers utilize protocols for management, yet wide variability in ECMO management was again highlighted. Continued prospective and collaborative research efforts are needed to make advancements in treatment and outcomes, and to help streamline the care of this complex patient population.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

Survey of 72 ECMO physicians showing unfractionated heparin remains primary anticoagulant (92.2%) but bivalirudin (52.9%) is routinely used by more than half of centers, with wide variability in monitoring practices.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This international cross-sectional survey assessed current practices in anticoagulation management, laboratory monitoring, and hematology involvement during ECMO therapy, receiving 72 responses from pediatric and adult physicians. Unfractionated heparin remained the anticoagulant of choice (92.2%), with bivalirudin used by 52.9% of respondents; the survey highlighted wide variability in ECMO management practices. The article has minimal relevance to ASH's domain: while ECMO anticoagulation sometimes involves HIT management where lepirudin (recombinant hirudin) has historically been relevant, this abstract makes no mention of hirudin, lepirudin, leeches, or any leech-derived therapy. CAVEAT: This is a survey of self-reported practice patterns with no primary clinical outcome data and no leech-related content; any connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome is entirely indirect.

Citation

Anticoagulation management and monitoring in ECMO: an international survey: communication from the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Pediatric and Neonatal Thrombosis and Hemostasis.

Regling K et al. · Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2026

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.