Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support: Pathophysiology of Pediatric Hemostasis and Available Options
Review published in Front Cardiovasc Med (2021)
Abstract
Pediatric mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is considered a strategy for heart failure management as a bridge to recovery and transplantation or as a destination therapy. The final outcome is significantly impacted by the number of complications that may occur during MCS. Children on ventricular assist devices (VADs) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are at high risk for bleeding and thrombotic complications that are managed through anticoagulation. The first detailed guideline in pediatric VADs (Edmonton Anticoagulation and Platelet Inhibition Protocol) was based on conventional antithrombotic drugs, such as unfractionated heparin (UFH) and warfarin. UFH is the first-line anticoagulant in pediatric MCS, although its profile is not considered optimal in pediatric setting. The broad variation in heparin doses among children is associated with frequent occurrence of cerebrovascular accidents, bleeding, and thrombocytopenia. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) have been utilized as alternative strategies to heparin. Since 2018, bivalirudin has become the chosen anticoagulant in the long-term therapy of patients undergoing MCS implantation, according to the most recent protocols shared in North America. This article provides a review of the non-traditional anticoagulation strategies utilized in pediatric MCS, focusing on pharmacodynamics, indications, doses, and monitoring aspects of bivalirudin. Moreover, it exposes the efforts and the collaborations among different specialized centers, which are committed to an ongoing learning in order to minimize major complications in this special pediatric population. Further prospective trials regarding DTIs in a pediatric MCS setting are necessary and in specific well-designed randomized control trials between UFH and bivalirudin. To conclude, based on the reported literature, the clinical use of the bivalirudin in pediatric MCS seems to be a value added in controlling and maybe reducing thromboembolic complications. Further research is necessary to confirm all the results provided by this literature review.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
Review of non-traditional anticoagulants in pediatric MCS focusing on bivalirudin pharmacodynamics, indications, doses and monitoring with bivalirudin now the chosen anticoagulant in long-term MCS therapy.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This review examines anticoagulation strategies in pediatric mechanical circulatory support, focusing on the pharmacodynamics, dosing, and monitoring of bivalirudin as a direct thrombin inhibitor alternative to unfractionated heparin for children on VADs and ECMO. The abstract describes bleeding and thrombotic complications of conventional heparin therapy and the growing adoption of bivalirudin since 2018, while calling for prospective randomized trials between UFH and bivalirudin. No defensible connection to hirudotherapy, leech therapy, or the leech secretome exists based on this abstract, which makes no mention of hirudin, leeches, or any derivation thereof. As a review article, it synthesizes existing literature rather than presenting new primary data, and its conclusions are limited by the quality and scope of the reviewed evidence.
Citation
Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support: Pathophysiology of Pediatric Hemostasis and Available Options.
Giorni C et al. · Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021
Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026