American Society of Hirudotherapy

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Research article published in Blood advances (2018)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Practice guidelineDrug DevelopmentCuker A et al. · Blood advances, 2018

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction mediated by platelet-activating antibodies that target complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Patients are at markedly increased risk of thromboembolism. OBJECTIVE: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about diagnosis and management of HIT. METHODS: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 33 recommendations. The recommendations address screening of asymptomatic patients for HIT, diagnosis and initial management of patients with suspected HIT, treatment of acute HIT, and special situations in patients with acute HIT or a history of HIT, including cardiovascular surgery, percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, renal replacement therapy, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Strong recommendations include use of the 4Ts score rather than a gestalt approach for estimating the pretest probability of HIT and avoidance of HIT laboratory testing and empiric treatment of HIT in patients with a low-probability 4Ts score. Conditional recommendations include the choice among non-heparin anticoagulants (argatroban, bivalirudin, danaparoid, fondaparinux, direct oral anticoagulants) for treatment of acute HIT.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticlePractice Guideline
Indexed MeSH termsAdministration, OralAnticoagulantsArginineCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresChondroitin SulfatesDermatan SulfateEvidence-Based MedicineFondaparinuxHeparinHeparan SulfateHirudinsHumans

Summary

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an adverse drug reaction mediated by platelet-activating antibodies that target complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

These evidence-based guidelines from the American Society of Hematology address the diagnosis and management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), providing 33 recommendations covering screening, diagnosis, acute treatment, and special situations including cardiovascular surgery, percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, renal replacement therapy, and venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. The panel conditionally recommends selecting among non-heparin anticoagulants—argatroban, bivalirudin, danaparoid, fondaparinux, and direct oral anticoagulants—for treatment of acute HIT. The abstract lists bivalirudin among several non-heparin anticoagulants without characterizing its relationship to hirudin or leech saliva. The abstract does not mention leeches, leech therapy, or the leech secretome, so there is no defensible connection to hirudotherapy.

Citation

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Cuker A et al. · Blood advances, 2018

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.