American Society of Hirudotherapy

Bivalirudin anticoagulation in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery

Pilot study published in J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth (2022)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentClinical TrialsHasija S et al. · Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2022

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the dosage of bivalirudin as the anticoagulant for cardiac surgery in neonates and infants. DESIGN: Pilot study. SETTING: Tertiary-care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five neonates and infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: The children received a 1 mg/kg bivalirudin bolus followed by a 2.5 mg/kg/h infusion as the anticoagulant for cardiac surgery. The dose was adjusted subsequently to maintain an activated clotting time (ACT) >480 s. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean age and weight were 5.3 months and 5.2 kg, respectively. Out of the 25 children, 16 were cyanotic. Baseline rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) (Tem Innovations GmbH, Munich, Germany) analysis revealed an underlying coagulation defect across EXTEM, INTEM, FIBTEM, and ADPTEM parameters. The dose of anticoagulant required was 1 mg/kg, followed by a 2.2 ± 0.4 mg/kg/h infusion. Only 1 child required an additional bolus dose. The ACT remained elevated for 4 hours after discontinuation of infusion. The mean 24-h postoperative chest tube drainage was 92 ± 36 mL. Excessive bleeding occurred in 4 children, 1 of whom required re-exploration. The platelet count remained low for 5 days, and, postoperatively, the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time remained low for 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: Effective anticoagulation was achieved with bivalirudin in the neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery. The dose required to maintain an ACT >480 s was 1.0 mg/kg, followed by 2.2 ± 0.4 mg/kg/h. The ACT remained elevated for 4 h after the discontinuation of bivalirudin infusion, resulting in an increased chest-tube output in some patients. Randomized, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the safety of bivalirudin in the neonates and infants with complex congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAnticoagulantsCardiac Surgical ProceduresHeart Defects, CongenitalHirudinsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPeptide FragmentsPilot ProjectsRecombinant Proteins

Summary

Pilot study of bivalirudin (1 mg/kg bolus, 2.2 mg/kg/h infusion) in 25 neonates/infants undergoing cardiac surgery; effective anticoagulation with ACT >480 s but elevated ACT post-infusion contributed to bleeding.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This pilot study determined the dosing of bivalirudin for systemic anticoagulation during cardiac surgery in 25 neonates and infants with congenital heart disease, using a 1 mg/kg bolus followed by an infusion titrated to maintain activated clotting time above 480 seconds. The authors report effective anticoagulation at a maintenance dose of 2.2 ± 0.4 mg/kg/h, though ACT remained elevated for four hours after discontinuation, contributing to increased chest-tube output in some patients, with excessive bleeding in 4 children and re-exploration in 1. The abstract does not mention hirudin, leeches, or any leech-derived compound, so no defensible hirudotherapy link exists. The authors describe this as a pilot study and call for randomized controlled trials to further evaluate safety.

Citation

Bivalirudin anticoagulation in neonates and infants undergoing cardiac surgery.

Hasija S et al. · Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2022

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.