American Society of Hirudotherapy

Update in hematology: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and bivalirudin

Review published in Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia (2011)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Narrative reviewDrug DevelopmentClinical TrialsAugoustides JGT · Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2011

Abstract

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is important because it is common, and it significantly increases mortality after cardiac surgery. Although thrombocytopenia after cardiac surgery is common, it predicts serious adverse outcome when it is severe. Despite the high prevalence of heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies in cardiac surgical patients, they typically do not indicate a higher perioperative risk. Recent evidence suggests, however, that when these antibodies are in the immunoglobulin M class, there is an increased risk of nonthrombotic adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. According to the guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians, patients with HIT require parenteral anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor such as lepirudin, argatroban, or bivalirudin. The transition to oral anticoagulation must be undertaken cautiously and only after the platelet count has recovered. Patients with a remote history of HIT can have cardiac surgery safely with unfractionated heparin. Patients with clinically active HIT who require cardiac surgery before the resolution of the HIT preferably should be anticoagulated with bivalirudin, dosed according to body weight and the goal-activated coagulation time. Given that bivalirudin is an established alternative to heparin as a thrombin inhibitor for cardiac surgery, it is likely that future trials will investigate which anticoagulant confers better outcomes after cardiac surgery, as is the case in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleReview
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsCardiac Surgical ProceduresHematologyHeparinHirudinsHumansPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsThrombocytopenia

Summary

Cardiac-surgery focused update on HIT management positioning bivalirudin as the established hirudin-class alternative to heparin for HIT patients requiring cardiac surgery, with weight-based dosing and goal-ACT monitoring.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This review provides an update on HIT in hematology and cardiac surgery, noting that guidelines require parenteral anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor such as lepirudin, argatroban, or bivalirudin. It emphasizes that patients with active HIT requiring cardiac surgery before HIT resolution should preferably receive bivalirudin, with cautious transition to oral anticoagulation after platelet recovery. The abstract names lepirudin as one guideline option but does not state that it is leech-derived, recombinant hirudin, or related to leech saliva, and it does not discuss hirudotherapy. Thus its relevance to ASH is limited and indirect, and the article focuses on pharmaceutical hem

Citation

Update in hematology: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and bivalirudin.

Augoustides JGT · Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 2011

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.