Update in hematology: heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and bivalirudin

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is important because it is common, and it significantly increases mortality after cardiac surgery. Although thrombocytopenia after cardiac surgery is common, it predicts serious adverse outcome when it is severe. Despite the high prevalence of heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies in cardiac surgical patients, they typically do not indicate a higher perioperative risk. Recent evidence suggests, however, that when these antibodies are in the immunoglobulin M class, there is an increased risk of nonthrombotic adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery. According to the guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians, patients with HIT require parenteral anticoagulation with a direct thrombin inhibitor such as lepirudin, argatroban, or bivalirudin. The transition to oral anticoagulation must be undertaken cautiously and only after the platelet count has recovered. Patients with a remote history of HIT can have cardiac surgery safely with unfractionated heparin. Patients with clinically active HIT who require cardiac surgery before the resolution of the HIT preferably should be anticoagulated with bivalirudin, dosed according to body weight and the goal-activated coagulation time. Given that bivalirudin is an established alternative to heparin as a thrombin inhibitor for cardiac surgery, it is likely that future trials will investigate which anticoagulant confers better outcomes after cardiac surgery, as is the case in percutaneous coronary intervention.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Cardiac-surgery-focused update on HIT management noting that guideline-directed therapy calls for a parenteral direct thrombin inhibitor (lepirudin, argatroban or bivalirudin), with bivalirudin the preferred choice for active HIT patients needing surgery before platelet recovery, dosed by body weight with a goal activated clotting time.

Explore how this research connects to clinical practice

More peer-reviewed studies in Drug Development.

• Hirudotherapy in Medicine and Dentistry — Jha K et al. (2015)
• Leech therapy: a history — Hyson J (2005)
• Hirudins of the Asian medicinal leech, Hirudinaria manillensis: same same, but different — Lukas P et al. (2019)
• Transcriptomic analysis of the salivary gland of medicinal leech Hirudo nipponia — Lu Z et al. (2018)
• Molecular dynamic and pharmacological studies on protein-engineered hirudin variants of Hirudinaria manillensis and Hirudo medicinalis — Sun Y et al. (2022)
• Cell-free synthesis of the hirudin variant 1 of the blood-sucking leech Hirudo medicinalis — Wüstenhagen D et al. (2020)
• Hirudin variants production by genetic engineered microbial factory — Zhang J, Lan N (2018)
• Hirudin in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia — Lubenow N, Greinacher A (2002)
• Hirudin ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting Gsdmd-mediated pyroptosis — Han J et al. (2023)
• Hirudin as alternative anticoagulant--a historical review — Markwardt F (2002)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →