American Society of Hirudotherapy

Comparisons of argatroban to lepirudin and bivalirudin in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Systematic review published in International journal of hematology (2017)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Meta-analysisDrug DevelopmentSun Z et al. · International journal of hematology, 2017

Abstract

To prevent thromboembolic events associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), patients usually are treated with argatroban, lepirudin, and bivalirudin. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies to comparing the treatment of HIT with the following direct thrombin inhibitor: argatroban versus lepirudin and argatroban versus bivalirudin. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database for relevant studies. The clinical outcomes were thromboembolic complication and bleeding. A total of 589 articles were found and 9 of which were finally included in this meta-analysis. There were no significantly differences of thromboembolic complication between argatroban and hirudin analogues (lepirudin and bivalirudin) in the treatment of HIT (lepirudin: RR = 0.773, 95% CI = 0.449-1.331, P = 0.353; bivalirudin: RR = 0.768, 95% CI = 0.386-1.527, P = 0.452). Moreover, the incidence of clinical bleeding of argatroban was similar to hirudin analogues (lepirudin: RR = 0.755, 95% CI = 0.531-1.073, P = 0.117; bivalirudin: RR = 0.995, 95% CI = 0.673-1.472, P = 0.981). Current evidences show that argatroban has the similar effectiveness and safety with lepirudin and bivalirudin for defending against HIT.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeComparative StudyJournal ArticleMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
Indexed MeSH termsArginineFemaleHeparinHirudinsHumansMalePipecolic AcidsRecombinant ProteinsSulfonamidesThrombocytopenia

Summary

Comparisons of argatroban to lepirudin and bivalirudin in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This systematic review and meta-analysis compared argatroban against lepirudin and bivalirudin—identified in the text as direct thrombin inhibitors and hirudin analogues—for the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Analyzing nine studies, the researchers found no significant differences between argatroban and these hirudin analogues regarding thromboembolic complications or clinical bleeding. While the abstract explicitly labels these drugs as hirudin analogues, it provides no further context regarding leeches, hirudin's natural origins, or hirudotherapy. Thus, while it touches upon agents categorized as hirudin analogues, its relevance to actual leech therapy or the broader leech secretome is indirect and limited to pharmaceutical terminology.

Citation

Comparisons of argatroban to lepirudin and bivalirudin in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Sun Z et al. · International journal of hematology, 2017

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.