Effect of post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention bivalirudin infusion on net adverse clinical events and mortality: A comprehensive pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Meta-analysis published in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions (2016)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacies of various post-percutaneous coronary intervenetion (PCI) bivalirudin doses on net adverse clinical events (NACEs) and mortality. BACKGROUND: In primary PCI, lower risk of bleeding with bivalirudin (vs. unfractionated heparin [UFH]) is counterbalanced by an increased risk of acute stent thrombosis (ST). Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and a recent meta-analysis suggest that acute ST risk may be eliminated without compromising the bleeding benefit, but only if the full dose, not a low dose, of bivalirudin is continued post-PCI. However, it is not known whether this improved risk leads to lower rates of NACEs and mortality. METHODS: Scientific databases and Web sites were searched for RCTs. Trials were included if study patients were undergoing primary PCI for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and were randomly assigned to bivalirudin or UFH treatment. The bivalirudin arm was divided based on post-PCI bivalirudin dosage: The Biv-Full group received 1.75 mg/kg/h, the Biv-Low group, 0.25 mg/kg/h, and the Biv-No group, none. RESULTS: Six RCTs involving 16,842 patients were found. In pairwise meta-analysis, bivalirudin improved 30-day all-cause mortality by 35% and cardiac mortality by 32%, but did not yield a NACE rate better than that achieved with UFH. Subgroup analysis showed the Biv-Full group had a 46% lower NACE rate and 47% lower all-cause mortality than UFH. These effects were not seen in the other two groups. Network meta-analysis yielded similar results. At treatment ranking, the Biv-Full group yielded the best treatment efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: In primary PCI, full-dose bivalirudin infusion for 3-4 hr after PCI appeared to improve NACE rates compared to UFH. It also seemed to be the most effective strategy for improving cardiac mortality and all-cause mortality. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.
Summary
To compare the efficacies of various post-percutaneous coronary intervenetion (PCI) bivalirudin doses on net adverse clinical events (NACEs) and mortality.
Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy
This pairwise and network meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials (16,842 patients) compared post-percutaneous coronary intervention bivalirudin dosing strategies — full dose, low dose, or no post-PCI infusion — against unfractionated heparin on net adverse clinical events and mortality in primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Bivalirudin improved 30-day all-cause and cardiac mortality but did not yield a better NACE rate than UFH overall; the full-dose post-PCI group showed lower NACE rates and mortality versus UFH, effects not seen with low-dose or no infusion. The abstract contains no mention of hirudin, leeches, leech saliva, or any leech-derived component, and does not characterize bivalirudin's pharmacological origin. Accordingly, no defensible connection to hirudotherapy, the leech secretome, or ASH's domain can be established from this source alone.
Citation
Effect of post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention bivalirudin infusion on net adverse clinical events and mortality: A comprehensive pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Shah R et al. · Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2016
Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026