American Society of Hirudotherapy

Postprocedural anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year results

RCT 1-year follow-up published in JACC Asia (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentClinical TrialsYan et al. · JACC. Asia, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The RIGHT trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: The authors aimed to report the prespecified 1-year outcomes. METHODS: RIGHT is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial conducted in 53 sites across China. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned (1:1) after primary PCI to receive low-dose PPA (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) or matching placebo for at least 48 hours. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) including all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite), and urgent revascularization (any vessel), were assessed during a 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 1.0 year (IQR: 1.0-1.0), MACE data were available for 99.2% of participants. MACEs occurred in 4.2% (63/1,494) of the PPA group and 4.9% (73/1,495) of the placebo group (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.61-1.21), with no between-group difference in major bleeding (1.3% vs 1.5%; HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.47-1.62). In the group of enoxaparin vs placebo, we observed reduction of MACEs with enoxaparin (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.30-0.97) with no excess bleeding. Meta-analyses also showed an advantage of enoxaparin over no anticoagulation in reducing MACEs at 30 days (risk ratio: 0.635; 95% CI: 0.399-0.997). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose PPA after primary PCI was safe but did not reduce ischemic events at the 1-year follow-up. If clinically indicated, our results suggest that enoxaparin may be beneficial and warrants confirmation in future studies. (Comparison of Anticoagulation Prolongation vs. no Anticoagulation in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI [RIGHT]; NCT03664180).

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

1-year follow-up results from postprocedural bivalirudin anticoagulation RCT after primary PCI for STEMI.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluated low-dose postprocedural anticoagulation (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) versus placebo for at least 48 hours after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, reporting 1-year outcomes. The study found that low-dose postprocedural anticoagulation was safe but did not reduce ischemic events at 1 year overall, though a subgroup comparison suggested enoxaparin may be beneficial. No leeches, hirudotherapy, or leech-derived products are mentioned anywhere in the abstract. Therefore, this article has no direct relevance to ASH's domain, and no hirudotherapy connection can be established from the abstract alone.

Citation

Postprocedural anticoagulation after primary percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year results.

Yan et al. · JACC. Asia, 2026

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.