Neural circuits for generating rhythmic movements

Inasmuch as the identified neural circuits discussed in this review pertain only to the nervous systems of two invertebrate species, one may ask whether or not these findings are generally applicable to central nervous oscillators that generate rhythmic movements in animals of other species and phyla, particularly in the vertebrates. This question is not easy to answer at this time, because detailed cellular network analyses thus far have been possible only in a very few neurophysiologically favorable preparations, such as those presented by the cardiac and stomatogastric ganglia of the lobster and the segmental ganglion of the leech. Nevertheless it is significant that the mechanisms according to which these invertebrate circuits are now thought to generate their oscillations--endogenous rhythmic polarization, reciprocal inhibition, and recurrent cyclic inhibition--were all first proposed to account for generation of rhythmic movements in vertebrate animals (7-9, 51, 71, 79). Moreover, the pattern of motor neuron activity in rhythmic movements of vertebrates is not necessarily more complex than the corresponding pattern in analogous movements of invertebrates. Therefore, the very much greater number of neurons in the central nervous system of vertebrates does not necessarily imply a greater complexity of the central oscillators that generate their rhythmic movements; it may only place greater obstacles in the way of identifying the underlying neuronal circuitry. In any case, it is worthy of note that the current list of fundamentally different and theoretically plausible types of neuronal oscillators is not only quite short but also of long standing. Thus, on these grounds, it seems reasonable to expect that the identified circuits discussed here will prove to be of general applicability to the generation of rhythmic movements in the whole animal kingdom.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Inasmuch as the identified neural circuits discussed in this review pertain only to the nervous systems of two invertebrate species, one may ask whether or not these findings are generally applicable to central nervous oscillators that generate rhythmic movements in animals of other species and phyla, particularly in the vertebrates.

Explore how this research connects to clinical practice

More peer-reviewed studies in Genomics & Proteomics.

• 434 Salivary Proteins — Integrated Proteomics of Hirudo medicinalis — Liu et al. (2019)
• Medicinal Leech Genome Assembly — Anticoagulant Gene Catalog — Kvist et al. (2020)
• Species Identification of Medicinal Leeches — Molecular Taxonomy — Siddall ME et al. (2007)
• Draft Genome of Hirudo medicinalis — BMC Genomics — Kvist S et al. (2020)
• Comparative Transcriptomics of Three Hirudo Species — Babenko VV et al. (2020)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)
• [Medicinal leeches and hirudotherapy] — Gödekmerdan A et al. (2011)
• [Cutaneous pseudolymphoma after hirudotherapy : Case report and review] — Hanner S et al. (2022)