American Society of Hirudotherapy

Bivalirudin in pediatric patients maintained on extracorporeal life support

Research article published in Pediatric critical care medicine (2013)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentNagle EL et al. · Pediatric critical care medicine, 2013

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anticoagulation with heparin is standard of care for patients maintained on extracorporeal life support. Very limited evidence exists for the use of alternative anticoagulants during extracorporeal life support. Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, heparin resistance, and evidence of significant thrombosis while on heparin may be candidates for alternative anticoagulation. The objective of this analysis is to present evidence for the use of bivalirudin during extracorporeal life support in pediatric patients. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: University of California, Davis Medical Center. PATIENTS: Twelve critically ill, pediatric patients receiving bivalirudin for anticoagulation during extracorporeal life support. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twelve patients meeting entry criteria received bivalirudin during the study period. The median patient age was 8 days (range, 1 d to 6 yr). Eight patients were neonates. Eight patients were male. Nine patients were supported with venoarterial extracorporeal life support. Median duration of extracorporeal life support was 226 hours (range, 111-913) and median time on bivalirudin was 92 hours (range, 60-230). Bivalirudin bolus doses were administered to select patients without bleeding complications. The maintenance dose that corresponded with initial target activated partial thromboplastin time ranged from 0.045 to 0.48 mg/kg/hr with a median rate of 0.16 mg/kg/hr. The median dose for days 1, 3, and 5 was 0.135, 0.175, and 0.267 mg/kg/hr, respectively. The correlation (r2) between dose adjustment and activated partial thromboplastin time response was 0.264. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest case series describing the use of a direct thrombin inhibitor in pediatric extracorporeal life support patients. The maintenance dose range reflected considerable inter-patient variability. There was an observed increase in dose requirements with time. Bivalirudin, with close monitoring, is a potential option for pediatric patients on extracorporeal life support who have developed heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, heparin resistance, or significant thrombosis while on heparin.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAntithrombinsChildChild, PreschoolDrug MonitoringExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleHirudinsHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLife Support CareMale

Summary

Bivalirudin in pediatric patients maintained on extracorporeal life support.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This case series—described by the authors as the largest for a direct thrombin inhibitor in pediatric extracorporeal life support—reports 12 critically ill pediatric patients who received bivalirudin for anticoagulation. The study provides dosing observations including a maintenance dose range with considerable inter-patient variability, a weak correlation between dose adjustment and aPTT response, and an observed increase in dose requirements over time. The abstract makes no mention of hirudin, leeches, or any relationship to hirudotherapy, so no defensible ASH connection can be drawn. As a case series without a control group, it cannot support direct comparative efficacy claims, and findings are limited to a specific vulnerable pediatric population.

Citation

Bivalirudin in pediatric patients maintained on extracorporeal life support

Nagle EL et al. · Pediatric critical care medicine, 2013

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.