American Society of Hirudotherapy

Impact of pre-PCI activated clotting time on outcomes of bivalirudin versus heparin during primary PCI

Pre-specified analysis published in J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv (2025)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentClinical TrialsLiu et al. · Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The BRIGHT-4 trial demonstrated that procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin followed by a median 3-hour high-dose infusion reduced the 30-day composite of all-cause mortality or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3 to 5 bleeding compared with heparin alone among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Whether the pre-PCI activated clotting time (ACT) influences this benefit is unknown. In the study, we aim to investigate whether the pre-PCI ACT levels affected the outcomes with each anticoagulant. METHODS: The BRIGHT-4 protocol required a pre-PCI ACT to be assessed 5 minutes after study medications were administered with additional anticoagulant boluses given to achieve an ACT ≥225 seconds. In the present prespecified analysis, 30-day outcomes were analyzed according to the initial pre-PCI ACT level. RESULTS: The initial pre-PCI ACT was <225 seconds in 971 of 5461 (17.8%) patients, including 123 of 2776 (4.4%) after bivalirudin and 848 of 2685 (31.6%) after heparin (P < .0001). Among 4490 of 5461 (82.2%) patients with an initial ACT ≥225 seconds, bivalirudin was associated with a lower incidence of BARC types 3 to 5 bleeding (0.2% vs 0.8%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.62; P = .004) and stent thrombosis (0.4% vs 1.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.81; P = .01) compared with heparin. Outcomes were not significantly different in bivalirudin and heparin-treated patients with an initial pre-PCI ACT <225 seconds. There were no significant interactions present between pre-PCI ACT strata and the treatment group for the primary end point or any of the secondary end points. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PCI with radial artery access, procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin was associated with lower 30-day rates of mortality, BARC types 3 to 5 bleeding, and stent thrombosis compared with heparin, findings that were consistent regardless of the pre-PCI ACT level.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

Pre-specified analysis of pre-PCI activated clotting time impact on bivalirudin-vs-heparin outcomes during primary PCI.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This prespecified analysis of the BRIGHT-4 trial examined whether pre-PCI activated clotting time (ACT) influenced outcomes with bivalirudin versus heparin in 5,461 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, finding that bivalirudin was associated with lower 30-day rates of BARC 3–5 bleeding and stent thrombosis, with consistent findings regardless of ACT level. For ASH, the abstract does not mention leeches, hirudotherapy, hirudin, or the leech secretome; the study is solely about pharmaceutical anticoagulation in interventional cardiology. No defensible connection to ASH's domain exists in this abstract—any relevance to leech-derived therapeutics would require external pharmacological knowledge not present in the article.

Citation

Impact of pre-PCI activated clotting time on outcomes of bivalirudin versus heparin during primary PCI.

Liu et al. · Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2025

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.