American Society of Hirudotherapy

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with acute aortic and renal thrombosis in a patient treated with low-molecular-weight heparin

Case report published in Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (2005)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Case reportDrug DevelopmentClinical LiteratureChevalier J et al. · European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2005

Abstract

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a rare but serious complication of heparin therapy. Most of cases are related to unfractionated heparin, but a few are due to low molecular weight heparin sometimes associated with unfractionated heparin. A patient with pulmonary contusions after chest injury developed a catheter related subclavian vein thrombosis on day 16. He was treated by increasing doses of low molecular weight heparin. Aortic and renal thromboses occurred on day 21. Surgical thrombectomy, performed after starting alternative anticoagulation treatment led to complete arterial recovery. In case of suspicion of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin, heparin treatment must be discontinued before the results of biological tests become available. Arterial and/or venous thrombosis is a serious complication of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The treatment has two aims: first, to restore arterial patency by clot removal by thrombectomy, bypass or thrombolysis, and second, to avoid new thrombosis formation by substitutive anticoagulation treatment: danaparoid may have cross-reaction with heparin, or lepirudin has anaphylactic risks and needs biological follow-up. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis can be complicated by death or disabilities such as amputations, stroke, renal or bowel infarction. Once HIT has been diagnosed heparin should never be given again, but if cardiopulmonary bypass is required, it might be reintroduced during operation only if serum antibodies have disappeared.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeCase ReportsJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAcute DiseaseAdultAnticoagulantsAorta, AbdominalHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansMaleRenal Artery ObstructionThrombocytopeniaThrombosis

Summary

A patient with pulmonary contusions after chest injury developed catheter-related subclavian vein thrombosis and then, despite escalating low-molecular-weight heparin, aortic and renal thromboses on day 21 suggesting HIT; thrombectomy after alternative anticoagulation restored arterial patency, with lepirudin discussed as a substitutive option.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This case report describes heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) complicated by acute aortic and renal thrombosis in a trauma patient receiving low-molecular-weight heparin, managed with surgical thrombectomy and alternative anticoagulation. The abstract specifically identifies lepirudin — recombinant hirudin derived from the medicinal leech Hirudo medicinalis — as a substitute anticoagulant option in HIT, while noting its anaphylactic risk and requirement for biological monitoring. This illustrates a clinically significant context in which a leech-secretome-derived anticoagulant serves as a recognized therapeutic alternative when heparin is contraindicated due to life-threatening thrombotic complications. The honest caveat is that this is a single case report documenting management options, not an efficacy study of lepirudin or other hirudin-based therapies; the abstract mentions lepirudin only as one option alongside its risks.

Citation

Reference (Vancouver style)

Chevalier J, Ducasse E, Dasnoy D, Puppinck P. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with acute aortic and renal thrombosis in a patient treated with low-molecular-weight heparin. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29(2):209-212. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.09.014. PMID: 15649731

Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.