American Society of Hirudotherapy

Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT)-like Syndrome: A Case Report and Some Considerations on a Novel Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge

Case report published in Diagnostics (2026)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Case reportDrug DevelopmentClinical TrialsDelfino L et al. · Diagnostics, 2026

Abstract

Background and Clinical Significance: Disorders caused by platelet-activating antibodies targeting platelet factor 4 (PF4) are recognized as the cause of severe thrombotic events and are not restricted to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Case Presentation: We report a 67-year-old man with thrombocytopenia and extensive portal-splenic-mesenteric vein thrombosis complicated by intestinal ischemia. Despite intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH), his condition worsened toward pulmonary embolism, septic shock, and multi-organ failure. Thrombolysis with alteplase was also ineffective. Both thrombophilia testing and autoimmune panels were negative, including those for antiphospholipid syndrome. An anti-PF4 immune thrombotic disorder was hypothesized. Therefore, argatroban was initiated instead of UFH therapy and intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) was administered. The platelet count increased and the patient's clinical condition progressively improved. An anti-PF4/heparin assay on a blood sample collected before IVIG was highly positive. Platelet activation assays did not demonstrate an increased activation after the addition of heparin (the Heparin-Induced Platelet Activation [HIPA] assay was negative) though increased activation was observed with the addition of PF4 (the PF4-Induced Platelet Activation [PIPA] assay was positive), thus defining a VITT-like syndrome. Conclusions: This case report highlights the crucial function of having adequate laboratory facilities available to disentangle different anti-PF4 disorders for an accurate definition of a specific diagnosis, such as VITT-like syndrome, thereby allowing for the most appropriate therapeutic management of these complex pathological conditions. The clinical suspicion of an anti-PF4 immune disorder should be considered in cases of severe, otherwise unexplained, thrombotic events associated with thrombocytopenia. Specific tests like HIPA and PIPA are essential for definitive diagnosis.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeCase ReportsJournal Article

Summary

A 67-year-old man with portal-splenic-mesenteric thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and pulmonary embolism was reclassified from HIT to VITT-like anti-PF4 disorder using PIPA assay; argatroban plus IVIG produced rapid platelet recovery and clinical improvement.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This case report describes a 67-year-old man with thrombocytopenia and extensive portal-splenic-mesenteric vein thrombosis complicated by intestinal ischemia, ultimately diagnosed as a VITT-like syndrome via a positive PF4-induced platelet activation (PIPA) assay and managed with argatroban and intravenous immune globulin (IVIG). The article has no direct relevance to ASH's domain: the abstract makes no mention of hirudin, lepirudin, leeches, or any leech-derived therapy, and the patient was managed entirely with argatroban and IVIG. CAVEAT: This is a single case report focused on diagnostic disentanglement of anti-PF4 disorders; it contains no leech-related content, and any connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome is absent.

Citation

Vaccine-Induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT)-like Syndrome: A Case Report and Some Considerations on a Novel Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge.

Delfino L et al. · Diagnostics, 2026

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.