American Society of Hirudotherapy

Comparison of two pediatric cases requiring the use of bivalirudin during cardiopulmonary bypass

Case report published in Perfusion (2018)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Case reportDrug DevelopmentClinical TrialsBryant ME et al. · Perfusion, 2018

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Comparison of two pediatric cases at our institution that utilized bivalirudin for anticoagulation on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); a bilateral lung transplant (BLT) and a ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. METHODS: The same bivalirudin protocol was utilized in both cases with an initial bolus of 1 mg/kg administered by the anesthesia team, a 50 mg bolus in the pump prime at the time of the initial patient bolus and an initial infusion rate of 2.5 mg/kg/h, with titration as needed during CPB to maintain kaolin-activated clotting time (K-ACT) values >400 s. RESULTS: The BLT experienced high K-ACT levels (>720 s) for the majority of the case despite decreasing the bivalirudin infusion rate to 0.5 mg/kg/h. The VAD implantation case required the bivalirudin infusion rate to be increased to 5.0 mg/kg/h throughout the case due to low K-ACTs. CONCLUSION: The literature strongly supports a specific infusion rate1-7 (2.5 mg/kg/h) for bivalirudin anticoagulation during extracorporeal circulation. Clinicians must consider the loss of clotting factors and the administration of blood products while adjusting the bivalirudin infusion during bypass. We have now elected to maintain an infusion rate of ≥0.5 mg/kg/h for bivalirudin anticoagulation at our center, based on institutional experience, though consideration for a higher infusion rate for an added margin of safety should be considered. It is imperative to have a well-developed protocol for the management of these cardiopulmonary bypass patients and we offer our one-page timeline of events to help guide other pediatric centers looking to use bivalirudin anticoagulation.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeCase ReportsJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAdolescentAntithrombinsCardiopulmonary BypassChildFemaleHirudinsHumansMalePeptide FragmentsRecombinant Proteins

Summary

Comparison of 2 pediatric bivalirudin CPB cases (bilateral lung transplant, VAD implantation) demonstrating need for individualized infusion rates from 0.5 to 5 mg/kg/h.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This case comparison describes two pediatric patients—a bilateral lung transplant and a ventricular assist device implantation—who received bivalirudin for anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass, with markedly different infusion requirements despite use of the same protocol. Bivalirudin is a synthetic analog of hirudin, the potent direct thrombin inhibitor originally derived from medicinal leech saliva, making this report relevant to ASH by illustrating real-world clinical management of a leech-secretome-derived anticoagulant in complex pediatric settings. The divergent dosing responses—one case requiring infusion reduction and the other requiring escalation—highlight practical titration and monitoring challenges with hirudin-based anticoagulation during extracorporeal circulation. As a comparison of only two cases at a single institution, however, this report offers limited generalizable evidence and cannot establish optimal dosing protocols.

Citation

Comparison of two pediatric cases requiring the use of bivalirudin during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Bryant ME et al. · Perfusion, 2018

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.