American Society of Hirudotherapy

Quantitative methods to improve bivalirudin dosing in pediatric cardiac ICU patients

Quantitative methods study published in Perfusion (2025)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentClinical TrialsBrinkley L et al. · Perfusion, 2025

Abstract

BackgroundA gap in knowledge exists related to optimal bivalirudin dosing in children. The purpose of our analysis is to use quantitative methods and baseline data to quickly predict the optimal therapeutic bivalirudin dose for children.MethodsWe developed an internal database of pediatric patients on ECMO or VAD, including baseline patient information, bivalirudin doses, and partial thromboplastin time (PTT) measurements throughout the treatment period. We fit an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model to the baseline data to determine the best predictors of therapeutic bivalirudin dose. We used five-fold cross-validation to ensure the model was not overfitting to any specific data subset.ResultsThe most notable variables that were statistically significant (p < .05) were: the primary use of bivalirudin for heart failure prophylaxis, no complications before bivalirudin administration, other reasons for bivalirudin use, other race (including Asian, pacific islander, and native American), Hispanic or Latinx ethnicity, primary diagnosis of heart failure, and primary diagnosis of myocarditis. To compare our model-predicted dose and the actual starting dose administered to the patients, we looked at how far off each of those was from the therapeutic dose. The mean of absolute differences was 0.28 mg/kg/hr for the administered starting dose and 0.23 mg/kg/hr for the model-predicted dose; therefore, the model results in an improvement of 18% in the difference from the therapeutic dose.ConclusionOur model provides an initial framework for determining a starting bivalirudin dose that takes into account patient demographic information and baseline admission data.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsHumansHirudinsPeptide FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsChildMaleFemaleChild, PreschoolAdolescentInfantIntensive Care Units, PediatricAntithrombins

Summary

ANCOVA model predicting therapeutic bivalirudin dose in pediatric ECMO/VAD patients with 18% improvement over current starting dose, identifying heart failure prophylaxis indication and demographic factors as key predictors.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This study developed a quantitative ANCOVA model using baseline demographic and clinical data from pediatric patients on ECMO or ventricular assist devices to predict optimal therapeutic bivalirudin starting dose. The model-derived dose was 18% closer to the eventual therapeutic dose than the clinically administered starting dose, with significant predictors including primary diagnosis (heart failure, myocarditis), race/ethnicity, and indication for bivalirudin use. This is relevant to ASH because bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor modeled on hirudin, and optimizing its dosing in children reflects real-world application of leech-inspired pharmacology. The caveat is that this work does not involve hirudotherapy or leech-derived products directly; it is a dosing-modeling study using retrospective internal data from a single pediatric ICU database, and the model remains a preliminary framework requiring prospective validation.

Citation

Quantitative methods to improve bivalirudin dosing in pediatric cardiac ICU patients.

Brinkley L et al. · Perfusion, 2025

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.