American Society of Hirudotherapy

Staged mechanical circulatory support in paediatric HIT: Bivalirudin anticoagulation across ECMO, VAD, and cardiac transplantation

Research article published in Perfusion (2025)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentBeeman AA et al. · Perfusion, 2025

Abstract

IntroductionHeparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) with in paediatric population is rare and subsequent anticoagulation management is challenging. Bivalirudin is a viable alternative to heparin for anticoagulating paediatric patients with HIT, though clinical data are limited. We describe the successful management of anticoagulation with bivalirudin from diagnosis through Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) implantation, and heart transplantation in a child with dilated cardiomyopathy and HIT.MethodsA 14-year-old girl presented with acute heart failure, intracardiac thrombi, and adenovirus positivity. Heparin was exchanged for bivalirudin once HIT criteria were met, associated with thrombocytopenia and progressive thrombus formation within the right atrium and superior vena cava (SVC). Due to end-organ dysfunction and refractory cardiac failure veno-arterial ECMO was initiated. Failure to achieve sufficient recovery prompted a VAD implantation, and subsequent orthotopic heart transplantation both managed using a modified bivalirudin protocol.ResultsManaging ECMO in the presence of HIT and intracardiac thrombi required careful multidisciplinary planning. We adjusted the bivalirudin infusion from 0.35 to 1.9 mg/kg/hr to maintain an activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) of 60-90 s, following our institutional protocol. For VAD implantation, we used citrate for circuit priming and initiated cardiopulmonary bypass without heparin, administering six bivalirudin boluses and escalating the infusion from 1.62 to 10 mg/kg/hr to achieve an Activated Clotting Time (ACT) > 400 s, with continuous ACT monitoring. During transplantation, anticoagulation involved four boluses and increasing the infusion from 0.35 to 5 mg/kg/hr to maintain an ACT >400 s. Despite significant post-CPB coagulopathy, which required delayed chest closure to control bleeding, no thrombotic events occurred. The bivalirudin protocols allowed safe progression through all three phases.ConclusionBivalirudin strategy provided safe, effective antithrombotic management across ECMO, VAD implantation, and heart transplantation in a paediatric patient with HIT. Monitoring its effectiveness at higher anticoagulation levels remains challenging, and patients may require higher doses to achieve desired endpoints.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

Staged mechanical circulatory support in paediatric HIT: Bivalirudin anticoagulation across ECMO, VAD, and cardiac transplantation.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This report describes successful bivalirudin anticoagulation across ECMO, VAD implantation, and heart transplantation in a 14-year-old girl with dilated cardiomyopathy and HIT, with infusion rates titrated from 0.35 to 10 mg/kg/hr using aPTT and ACT monitoring, and no thrombotic events despite post-CPB coagulopathy. No defensible connection to hirudotherapy or the leech secretome exists from this abstract—it does not mention hirudin, leeches, or any leech-derived substances. This is a single-patient report focused on pharmaceutical anticoagulation management in pediatric cardiac care, with findings that are inherently non-generalizable.

Citation

Staged mechanical circulatory support in paediatric HIT: Bivalirudin anticoagulation across ECMO, VAD, and cardiac transplantation

Beeman AA et al. · Perfusion, 2025

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.