American Society of Hirudotherapy

Anticoagulants: from chance discovery to structure-based design

Comprehensive review published in Pharmacological Reviews (2025)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentSalivary PharmacologyChan N et al. · Pharmacological reviews, 2025

Abstract

Taking a historical perspective, we review the discovery, pharmacology, and clinical evaluation of the old and new anticoagulants that have been approved for clinical use. The drugs are discussed chronologically, starting in the 1880s, and progressing through to 2024. The innovations in technology used to develop novel anticoagulants came in fits and starts and reflected the advances in science and technology over these decades, whereas the shift from anecdote to evidence-based use of anticoagulants was delayed until the principles of epidemiology and biostatistics were introduced into clinical trial design and to the approval process. Hirudin, heparin, and vitamin K antagonists were discovered by chance, and were used clinically before their mechanism of action was elucidated and before their net clinical benefits were evaluated in randomized clinical trials. Subsequent anticoagulants were designed based on a better understanding of the structure and function of coagulation proteins, including antithrombin, thrombin, and factor Xa, and underwent more rigorous preclinical and clinical evaluation before regulatory approval. By simplifying oral anticoagulation, the direct oral anticoagulants have revolutionized anticoagulation care and have enhanced the uptake of anticoagulation, but bleeding has not been eliminated and there is a need for more effective and convenient anticoagulants for thrombosis triggered by the contact pathway of coagulation. The newly developed factor XIa and XIIa inhibitors have the potential to address these unmet clinical needs and are undergoing clinical evaluation for several indications. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of treatment and prevention of thrombosis, which remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Elucidation of the structure and function of coagulation enzymes, their cofactors, and inhibitors, coupled with advances in structure-based design led to the discovery of more convenient, safer, and more effective anticoagulants that have revolutionized the management of thrombotic disorders.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeHistorical ArticleJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsHumansAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyThrombosis

Summary

Comprehensive review of anticoagulant drug development from chance discovery (heparin, hirudin) through structure-based design of DOACs. Major historical synthesis.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This historical review traces the discovery and clinical development of anticoagulants from the 1880s through 2024, including hirudin as one of the chance-discovered early anticoagulants used clinically before its mechanism was elucidated. For ASH's domain, the article provides useful historical context situating hirudin as a foundational anticoagulant that preceded modern structure-based drug design. However, this is a narrative historical article, not original research, and hirudin is discussed only as one of several anticoagulants in a broad chronological survey; it offers no new experimental data on hirudin, leeches, or the leech secretome. Its relevance is indirect and background-level.

Citation

Anticoagulants: from chance discovery to structure-based design.

Chan N et al. · Pharmacological reviews, 2025

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.