American Society of Hirudotherapy

Prevention of rethrombosis after coronary thrombolysis in a chronic canine model. II. Adjunctive therapy with r-hirudin

Animal model study published in Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology (1994)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: In vitro / laboratoryDrug DevelopmentClinical TrialsRote WE et al. · Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1994

Abstract

We examined the effectiveness of the direct-acting thrombin inhibitor, recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin), for prevention of coronary rethrombosis after thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in a canine model of coronary artery thrombosis. The reocclusion rate of 15-30% associated with thrombolytic therapy emphasizes the need for adjunctive therapy to prevent rethrombosis. We studied r-hirudin for its potential to prevent reocclusion in a model of coronary artery thrombosis/thrombolysis. The circumflex coronary arteries of anesthetized dogs were instrumented with a flow probe, an intraluminal electrode, and a ligature stenosis. The dogs were reanesthetized on the ninth postoperative day, and intimal injury was induced with an anodal current. After occlusive thrombus formation, tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) was administered. The animals were allocated to receive either placebo, r-hirudin [5 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) bolus, 2 mg/kg/h i.v., for 3.5 h] or r-hirudin (5 mg/kg i.v., bolus, 1 mg/kg/h i.v., for 12 h). Neither aspirin nor heparin was used. Ex vivo platelet function and coronary artery blood flow velocity were recorded on each of 5 consecutive days. Infarct size and residual thrombus weight were determined at the end of the protocol. r-Hirudin infusion (3.5 and 12 h) provided little benefit over rt-PA alone. Ex vivo platelet aggregation was not affected by r-hirudin. Little improvement in the incidence of reocclusion and mortality in a model of coronary artery thrombosis/thrombolysis resulted from adjunctive treatment with r-hirudin.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Indexed MeSH termsAnimalsBlood CoagulationChronic DiseaseCoronary ThrombosisCoronary VesselsDogsFibrinolytic AgentsHirudin TherapyMaleMyocardial InfarctionPlatelet AggregationRecombinant Proteins

Summary

Canine coronary thrombosis/thrombolysis model showed that r-hirudin (5 mg/kg bolus + 1–2 mg/kg/h for 3.5 to 12 h) without aspirin/heparin provided only minor benefit over rt-PA alone in preventing reocclusion.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This study examined recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin) as an adjunct to rt-PA thrombolysis for preventing coronary rethrombosis in a canine model, testing two infusion regimens (3.5 h and 12 h) without aspirin or heparin. R-hirudin provided little benefit over rt-PA alone: ex vivo platelet aggregation was unaffected, and minimal improvement occurred in reocclusion incidence and mortality. The abstract concludes that little improvement resulted from adjunctive treatment with r-hirudin in this model. Relevance to ASH's domain is indirect — the study evaluates recombinant hirudin but does not reference leeches or hirudotherapy. The study is limited by its animal model; notably, neither aspirin nor heparin was used as adjunctive therapy.

Citation

Prevention of rethrombosis after coronary thrombolysis in a chronic canine model. II. Adjunctive therapy with r-hirudin.

Rote WE et al. · Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1994

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.