American Society of Hirudotherapy

Interference of thrombin in immunological assays for hirudin specific antibodies

Research article published in Journal of immunological methods (2012)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Observational studyDrug DevelopmentHamilton RG et al. · Journal of immunological methods, 2012

Abstract

Recombinant hirudins (desirudin, lepirudin) are direct thrombin inhibitors administered as anticoagulants for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. Although these small polypeptides are widely used, concern exists over reports of antigenicity. In the largest study of r-hirudin immunogenicity to-date, we evaluated the prevalence, quantity and specificity of IgG immune responses to desirudin (15 mg SC q12h for as long as clinically required) in 245 surgical and medically-ill subjects enrolled in DESIRABLE, a multicenter, open-label, clinical trial of hospitalized patients requiring VTE prophylaxis. Sera obtained before and 30 days after desirudin administration were analyzed for IgG anti-desirudin by immunoenzymetric assay using immobilized desirudin to bind desirudin-reactive antibody and peroxidase conjugated monoclonal-anti-human IgG Fc to detect bound IgG antibody. Of 245 study subjects, 19 (7.7%) were antibody "responders" (>2-fold increase in IgG antibody levels with >50% inhibition by desirudin 30 days post-treatment). There were no differences between responders and non-responders in incidence of clinical outcomes or bleeding-related adverse events. Forty-six patients had detectable desirudin-reactive IgG antibody prior to treatment, with no significant increase in antibody levels after exposure and no increase in clinical events. The origin of pre-existing hirudin-reactive IgG antibody requires further investigation involving suspected anti-thrombin-thrombin interactions. These results indicate a low potential for immunogenicity, with <8% of patients developing IgG antibodies after desirudin administration for VTE prophylaxis. In contrast to reports on lepirudin, production of anti-hirudin antibodies to desirudin has no apparent effect on clinical events.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleMulticenter StudyResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Indexed MeSH termsAgedAntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibody SpecificityAntithrombinsFemaleHeparinHirudin TherapyHirudinsHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesImmunoglobulin G

Summary

Recombinant hirudins (desirudin, lepirudin) are direct thrombin inhibitors administered as anticoagulants for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This multicenter study evaluated the prevalence, quantity, and clinical significance of IgG antibodies against desirudin (recombinant hirudin) in 245 hospitalized surgical and medical patients receiving venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, finding that 7.7% developed anti-desirudin antibodies post-treatment with no apparent effect on clinical outcomes or bleeding-related adverse events. The study also identified pre-existing hirudin-reactive IgG in 46 patients prior to exposure, the origin of which requires further investigation. This is directly relevant to ASH's domain as it characterizes the immunogenicity profile of a key leech-derived anticoagulant in clinical use, which is important for understanding the safety of hirudin-based therapies. However, the study concerns subcutaneously administered recombinant desirudin only; it does not involve living leeches, the full leech secretome, or traditional hirudotherapy.

Citation

Interference of thrombin in immunological assays for hirudin specific antibodies

Hamilton RG et al. · Journal of immunological methods, 2012

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.