American Society of Hirudotherapy

Prolonged thrombin inhibition reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty in porcine coronary arteries

Research article published in Circulation (1998)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: In vitro / laboratoryDrug DevelopmentGallo R · Circulation, 1998

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arterial injury after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) triggers acute thrombus formation and thrombin generation. Hirudin, a potent and direct thrombin inhibitor, prevents thrombus formation after arterial injury. Two large clinical trials showed marked reduction in acute clinical events but no long-term benefits in reducing restenosis during short-term administration of thrombin inhibitors. Our hypothesis is that adequate, maintained thrombin inhibition, by inhibiting all the thrombin-dependent mechanisms, will reduce neointima formation after PTCA. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty-six pigs received three different regimens of hirudin: bolus (1 mg/kg), short-term (bolus + 0.7 mg/kg per day for 2 days), and long-term (bolus + 0.7 mg/kg per day for 14 days). The results on neointima formation at 4 weeks after coronary angioplasty were compared with the control group (100 IU heparin/kg bolus). Hirudin was continuously administered for 2 weeks through an infusion pump. In vivo thrombin generation was persistently increased up to 2 weeks after angioplasty. Inhibition of thrombin activity for 14 days reduced luminal narrowing by 40% (58+/-3% versus 35+/-3%; P<.001). No differences were observed among the bolus and short-term hirudin groups and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that there is a continued, marked thrombin generation that lasts for at least 2 weeks after PTCA. Administration of r-hirudin for 2 weeks significantly reduces neointima formation after PTCA. This observation, if extrapolated to humans, could explain the lack of effect on restenosis observed in the clinical trials with antithrombin agents despite the clear benefits on reducing acute thrombotic complications after PTCA. Therefore an adequate and prolonged administration of thrombin inhibitors is needed to "passivate" the thrombogenic substrate (disrupted arterial wall) and achieve full benefit of this therapeutic approach.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Indexed MeSH termsAngioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryAnimalsAntithrombinsCoronary DiseaseCoronary VesselsHirudinsPartial Thromboplastin TimeRecombinant ProteinsRecurrenceSwineThrombin

Summary

Arterial injury after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) triggers acute thrombus formation and thrombin generation.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This porcine study examined whether prolonged administration of recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin), described in the abstract as a potent and direct thrombin inhibitor, could reduce neointima formation after coronary balloon angioplasty. Thirty-six pigs received bolus, short-term (2-day), or long-term (14-day) r-hirudin regimens versus a heparin control, with continuous infusion via pump. Only the 14-day regimen reduced luminal narrowing by approximately 40% (P<.001), while shorter regimens showed no benefit over control, suggesting sustained thrombin inhibition is needed to reduce neointima formation. The study is relevant to ASH's domain only indirectly, as hirudin is the named compound studied but the abstract does not reference leeches or hirudotherapy. The main caveats are that these findings are from an animal model requiring human validation, and the study measured neointima formation/luminal narrowing rather than clinical restenosis directly.

Citation

Prolonged thrombin inhibition reduces restenosis after balloon angioplasty in porcine coronary arteries

Gallo R · Circulation, 1998

Added to ASH library: May 27, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.