American Society of Hirudotherapy

Use of lepirudin during percutaneous vascular interventions in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Research article published in The Journal of invasive cardiology (2003)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Clinical trialDrug DevelopmentCochran et al. · The Journal of invasive cardiology, 2003

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a well-known complication of heparin exposure and presents a clinical dilemma for patients undergoing percutaneous intervention (PI). Heparin cannot be used for thrombin inhibition and direct thrombin inhibitors offer an attractive alternative to heparin. We report our experience with lepirudin, a recombinant hirudin, used for PI in HIT patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing PI with known diagnosis of HIT were assigned to varying doses of lepirudin, often in combination with a platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Predetermined endpoints of safety and efficacy were assessed prospectively. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients underwent a total of 36 interventions. Angiographic success was obtained in 100% of patients and clinical success (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, stroke or target vessel revascularization) in 92% of patients. There was 1 procedure-related mortality resulting from a retroperitoneal bleed. Three patients had minor bleeding. CONCLUSION: Lepirudin is efficacious as a replacement for heparin in patients with HIT undergoing PI. Caution should be used when using a combination of lepirudin, GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, clopidogrel and aspirin.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeClinical TrialComparative StudyJournal Article
Indexed MeSH termsAbciximabAngioplasty, BalloonAntibodies, MonoclonalAnticoagulantsDrug Therapy, CombinationEptifibatideFemaleHeparinHirudinsHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsMalePeptidesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPlatelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa ComplexProspective StudiesRecombinant ProteinsThrombocytopeniaTirofibanTreatment OutcomeTyrosine

Summary

In 25 heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients undergoing 36 percutaneous interventions with lepirudin—often combined with a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor—angiographic success was 100% and clinical success 92%, with one procedure-related retroperitoneal bleed death and three minor bleeding events.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This prospective study reported experience using lepirudin (recombinant hirudin) as a heparin substitute in 25 patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing 36 percutaneous vascular interventions, frequently combined with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, achieving 100% angiographic success and 92% clinical success, with one procedure-related mortality from retroperitoneal hemorrhage and three minor bleeding events. It is a clinical application of a leech-derived anticoagulant in interventional cardiology. Caveat: Small sample size without a concurrent control group, and the authors caution about bleeding risk when combining lepirudin with multiple antiplatelet agents; the study concerns pharmaceutical recombinant hirudin rather than live leech therapy.

Citation

Reference (Vancouver style)

Cochran K, DeMartini TJ, Lewis BE, O Brien J, Steen LH, Grassman ED, et al. Use of lepirudin during percutaneous vascular interventions in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. J Invasive Cardiol. 2003;15(11):617-621. PMID: 14608129

Bibliographic details (authors, volume, pages, DOI) are taken from the PubMed record.

Added to ASH library: May 28, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.