2025 Guidelines for direct oral anticoagulants: a practical guidance on the prescription, laboratory testing, peri-operative and bleeding management

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely prescribed to prevent and treat venous and arterial thromboembolism, supported by published evidence, and are preferred over warfarin in many guidelines. Although the risk of major bleeding, in particular intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), is decreased with DOACs, gastrointestinal bleeding is increased with some DOACs, and the case fatality rate of bleeding remains high. Therefore, it is important to (i) prescribe DOACs appropriately, (ii) have strategies to manage major bleeding including the use of specific reversal agents and (iii) interrupt and resume DOACs for procedures. The main recommendations are as follows: (i) Select the appropriate dose of DOAC according to indications and consider patient factors to minimise bleeding risks; (ii) DOACs do not require routine laboratory testing; (iii) for life-threatening uncontrollable bleeding, specific agents can be used to reverse the anticoagulant effects of DOACs; and (iv) DOACs can be interrupted for planned procedures without the need for 'bridging' with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). The anticoagulant effects of DOACs can be reversed with specific agents, such as andexanet for apixaban and rivaroxaban and idarucizumab for dabigatran. If not available, pro-haemostatic agents such as prothrombin complex concentrates or activated prothrombin complex concentrates can be considered. DOACs can be interrupted and resumed for procedures without the need for 'bridging' with LMWH.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely prescribed to prevent and treat venous and arterial thromboembolism, supported by published evidence, and are preferred over warfarin in many guidelines.

Leech-derived molecules this paper discusses, each with a full profile in the ASH compound registry:

Explore how this research connects to clinical practice

More peer-reviewed studies in Clinical Trials.

• Leech Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis — The Landmark RCT — Michalsen et al. (2003)
• Leech-Assisted Flap Salvage — Systematic Review of 277 Cases — Whitaker et al. (2012)
• Effects of hirudotherapy on liver functions, lipid profile, and insulin sensitivity in rats with metabolic syndrome — Bilden A et al. (2026)
• Efficacy and Safety of Hirudotherapy for Improving Sperm Quality Parameters in Male Infertility: A Randomized Controlled Trial — Abtahi-Forooshani M et al. (2026)
• Reverse Sural Flap Venous Congestion Successfully Managed With Enoxaparin in a Male Patient With a Traumatic Foot Crush Injury: A Case Report — Velasco-Bustamante J et al. (2026)
• Investigation of the therapeutic effects of medicinal leech treatment on lower extremity ischemia-reperfusion injury — Ünal K et al. (2026)
• Efficacy of Medicinal Leech Therapy in Diverse Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Study from Azerbaijan — Farzali S et al. (2025)
• HIRUDOTHERAPY IN RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY: CASE-REPORTS AND REVIEW — Heinz P et al. (2020)
• Hirudotherapy Efficacy and Complications in the Management of Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review — Foppiani J et al. (2024)
• Hirudotherapy in Wound Healing — Nair H et al. (2022)

Browse all ASH-analysed research →