American Society of Hirudotherapy

Effects of Bivalirudin and Unfractionated Heparin on Liver and Renal Function in Chinese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Coronary Angiography with/without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Research article published in Journal of clinical and translational hepatology (2021)

Last Updated: June 18, 2026Reviewed by: ASH Editorial Board
Research article — evidence reviewArticle reference
Evidence: Research reportDrug DevelopmentJia et al. · Journal of clinical and translational hepatology, 2021

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and bivalirudin are widely used as anticoagulants in cardiovascular medicine, including for thrombosis prevention during coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Little is known of the effects of UFH and bivalirudin on liver and kidney function in patients subjected to these procedures. This study compared the effects of bivalirudin and UFH on liver/renal function in patients with coronary artery disease who underwent CAG, with or without PCI. METHODS: The study comprised 134 consecutive patients (40-89 years-old), who underwent CAG (or CAG and PCI); among them, 66 and 68 patients were subject to, respectively, bivalirudin or UFH. The following indicators of liver/renal function were measured before and after the procedures: plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), blood urea nitrogen, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), creatinine clearance, and serum creatinine. Patients were further stratified by severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD), based on original eGFR. RESULTS: Relative to baseline, in the bivalirudin group, ALT and AST were higher after CAG (p=0.005, 0.025), while blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine were lower (p=0.049, <0.001). In the UFH group, ALT, AST, eGFR, and creatinine clearance were lower after CAG (p≤0.001, all). Patients given bivalirudin with moderate or severe CKD, but not those with mild CKD, gained significant improvement in kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to UFH, bivalirudin may better safeguard the renal function of patients with coronary artery disease who undergo CAG, especially patients with moderate-to-severe renal insufficiency. UFH may cause less liver damage than bivalirudin.

Abstract sourced from PubMed (NCBI) for the cited record. See the original publication for the authoritative version.

Publication typeJournal Article

Summary

Peer-reviewed pharmacology and drug-development research relevant to anticoagulants and leech-derived compounds. Indexed in PubMed and verified against the NCBI record.

Why This Matters for Hirudotherapy

This comparative clinical study of 134 patients undergoing coronary angiography (with or without PCI) measured liver and renal function before and after the procedure under bivalirudin (n=66) versus unfractionated heparin (n=68), reporting that bivalirudin appeared to better preserve renal function (particularly in moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease) while UFH was associated with less liver enzyme elevation. The hirudotherapy link is through bivalirudin, a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor whose mechanism descends from leech hirudin, showing how leech-secretome-derived anticoagulation is being characterized for organ-specific safety, not just antithrombotic effect. As a caveat, this is a modest-sized comparative study using surrogate laboratory endpoints (ALT, AST, eGFR, creatinine) rather than hard clinical outcomes, its observations point in mixed directions for liver versus kidney, and it concerns a manufactured drug rather than medicinal-leech therapy.

Citation

Effects of Bivalirudin and Unfractionated Heparin on Liver and Renal Function in Chinese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Coronary Angiography with/without Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Jia et al. · Journal of clinical and translational hepatology, 2021

Added to ASH library: May 29, 2026 · Site last updated: June 18, 2026

This website provides educational information and does not constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. Medicinal leech therapy carries clinically meaningful risks and should be performed only by qualified clinicians under institutionally approved protocols. FDA 510(k) clearance for medicinal leeches is limited to specific indications; investigational and off-label discussions are labeled accordingly. For patient-specific guidance, consult a qualified healthcare provider.